This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Savić Marković Štedimlija article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wanderer, Montenegro wasn't independent really at all. It was a puppet-state under Italian control and then German occupation (whereas most of the territory was even not held by the occupiers, but the Chetniks throughout most of the war). -- PaxEquilibrium 21:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
It has nothing to do with me, but then's ideology.
What Stedimlija was saying then was insane to people as much as what Jevrem Brkovic is saying now. I don't care if Montenegrins are "really" Serbs or not (which is a question of both immoral and nonsensical definitions), but we cannot rewrite what happened then. To tell a Montenegrin he's not a Serb (whatever that meant) back then would be like calling Miodrag (of the Liberal Party) a Chetnik today.
Besides, the remains still "scar" the world. In the world, history of Montenegro is still treated as "became out of Serbs" in practically everywhere - from the LaRousse, Brockhaus and Britannica encyclopedias, across the CIA World Factbook to all media reporters like BBC, CNN and Times - it's even more extreme than the situation in Austria, they believe that Montenegrins are "real" Serbs. Considering how 100 years are needed to purge/change these things... who knows how will it take... -- PaxEquilibrium 12:09, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
He seemed to know he came from this particular group. Is it not inappropriate to call it Serb on this page if he himself had a Pan-Croat ideology? Evlekis ( talk) 22:36, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Savić Marković Štedimlija article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wanderer, Montenegro wasn't independent really at all. It was a puppet-state under Italian control and then German occupation (whereas most of the territory was even not held by the occupiers, but the Chetniks throughout most of the war). -- PaxEquilibrium 21:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
It has nothing to do with me, but then's ideology.
What Stedimlija was saying then was insane to people as much as what Jevrem Brkovic is saying now. I don't care if Montenegrins are "really" Serbs or not (which is a question of both immoral and nonsensical definitions), but we cannot rewrite what happened then. To tell a Montenegrin he's not a Serb (whatever that meant) back then would be like calling Miodrag (of the Liberal Party) a Chetnik today.
Besides, the remains still "scar" the world. In the world, history of Montenegro is still treated as "became out of Serbs" in practically everywhere - from the LaRousse, Brockhaus and Britannica encyclopedias, across the CIA World Factbook to all media reporters like BBC, CNN and Times - it's even more extreme than the situation in Austria, they believe that Montenegrins are "real" Serbs. Considering how 100 years are needed to purge/change these things... who knows how will it take... -- PaxEquilibrium 12:09, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
He seemed to know he came from this particular group. Is it not inappropriate to call it Serb on this page if he himself had a Pan-Croat ideology? Evlekis ( talk) 22:36, 30 July 2008 (UTC)