I notice that the sources used are overwhelmingly Christian music sources (I think the only exceptions are AllMusic and Billboard). Was there really no coverage of the album in the mainstream media? I'm not saying the current sources aren't RS, just that a wider perspective would be valuable.
We're just talking about the "Critical reception" section here, right? I've searched
Factiva and Google and found nothing beyond the Billboard review. But I agree that having a wider perspective is desirable, and I'd be happy to move the section in that direction when it becomes practicable. —
Zeagler (
talk)
17:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)reply
All in all a very good article, and easy to review. The only issue I have is with the sources, I guess I'm just asking if you've looked without finding anything.
Lampman (
talk)
16:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)reply
I notice that the sources used are overwhelmingly Christian music sources (I think the only exceptions are AllMusic and Billboard). Was there really no coverage of the album in the mainstream media? I'm not saying the current sources aren't RS, just that a wider perspective would be valuable.
We're just talking about the "Critical reception" section here, right? I've searched
Factiva and Google and found nothing beyond the Billboard review. But I agree that having a wider perspective is desirable, and I'd be happy to move the section in that direction when it becomes practicable. —
Zeagler (
talk)
17:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)reply
All in all a very good article, and easy to review. The only issue I have is with the sources, I guess I'm just asking if you've looked without finding anything.
Lampman (
talk)
16:38, 4 February 2009 (UTC)reply