![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
Shuki is trying to make many inappropriate changes. For instance add the claim "The report is not a binding document." What does that mean? It is a report regarding information requested by the prime minister. You keep changing "illegal" to "unauthorized". The reprot is very clear that it discusses many illegal operations by government and local officials and other people. The whole stuff starting with "The report states that there are certain aspects in order to establish a community in Judea and Samaria or its expansion:" is really not well written and not in Wikipedia style. Mashkin ( talk) 23:55, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Shuki is making similar changes in the Israeli settlement article.
Shuki claims that "unauthorized" is a better translation of the Hebrew, but the "illegal" usage seems more common in the English press. Factsontheground ( talk) 00:16, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
I see he is also removing category tags from individual settlements. Factsontheground ( talk) 00:32, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Shuki, if you object to the name of Category:Illegal Israeli outposts a more constructive response would be to propose a name change rather than trying to delete it completely, since it is (or was) used on articles dealing with illegal/unauthorized settlements. Factsontheground ( talk) 03:26, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
The policy if avoiding weasel words is perciely the reason to use the term "illegal" for what the Sasson report describes. It talks a lot about various illegal activities but does not attach the term to the outposts. To clarify that it does not use the term I am using the sentence "illegal (or unauthorized in the report's language)". The stable version has just plain illegal, so if you don't like my version, please revert to plain illegal until the end of the discussion. Mashkin ( talk) 23:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Seems like a significantly notable person. Any thoughts? PPX ( talk) 14:00, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
Shuki is trying to make many inappropriate changes. For instance add the claim "The report is not a binding document." What does that mean? It is a report regarding information requested by the prime minister. You keep changing "illegal" to "unauthorized". The reprot is very clear that it discusses many illegal operations by government and local officials and other people. The whole stuff starting with "The report states that there are certain aspects in order to establish a community in Judea and Samaria or its expansion:" is really not well written and not in Wikipedia style. Mashkin ( talk) 23:55, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
Shuki is making similar changes in the Israeli settlement article.
Shuki claims that "unauthorized" is a better translation of the Hebrew, but the "illegal" usage seems more common in the English press. Factsontheground ( talk) 00:16, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
I see he is also removing category tags from individual settlements. Factsontheground ( talk) 00:32, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Shuki, if you object to the name of Category:Illegal Israeli outposts a more constructive response would be to propose a name change rather than trying to delete it completely, since it is (or was) used on articles dealing with illegal/unauthorized settlements. Factsontheground ( talk) 03:26, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
The policy if avoiding weasel words is perciely the reason to use the term "illegal" for what the Sasson report describes. It talks a lot about various illegal activities but does not attach the term to the outposts. To clarify that it does not use the term I am using the sentence "illegal (or unauthorized in the report's language)". The stable version has just plain illegal, so if you don't like my version, please revert to plain illegal until the end of the discussion. Mashkin ( talk) 23:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Seems like a significantly notable person. Any thoughts? PPX ( talk) 14:00, 8 March 2016 (UTC)