This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Saskatchewan Highway 219 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Saskatchewan Highway 219's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "microsoft":
{{
cite map}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help){{
cite map}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help)I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
There's a paragraph about plans to upgrade the highway to improve access to Dakota Dunes. I think this might be an outdated reference as I drove the route last week and it seems to have been upgraded. It's certainly nowhere near as rough or "pot-holey" as it was a decade ago. 23skidoo ( talk) 16:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Saskatchewan Highway 219 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Saskatchewan Highway 219's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "microsoft":
{{
cite map}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help){{
cite map}}
: |access-date=
requires |url=
(
help)I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
There's a paragraph about plans to upgrade the highway to improve access to Dakota Dunes. I think this might be an outdated reference as I drove the route last week and it seems to have been upgraded. It's certainly nowhere near as rough or "pot-holey" as it was a decade ago. 23skidoo ( talk) 16:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)