This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present
information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see
Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the
project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
The table states that the parent mountain for Sasir Kangri I is Gasherbrum; can anyone shed any light on this? Gasherbrum is about 100 miles away to the north-west. Surely Sasir Kangri I is the main peak in this sub-range, so it doesn't have a "parent peak".
Moonraker12 (
talk) 18:16, 14 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Please see the article
Topographic prominence, especially that section:
Topographic prominence#Parent Peak. You may learn that every peak has a parent unless it is the highest Peak on an island or continent. But the information in the list is arguable: Gasherbrum I is only a line parent of Saser Kangri. The prominence of G1 is less than that of SK1 (so G1 doesn't qualify for prominence parentage) and the Key Col of G1 is higher than that of SK1 (so G1 doesn't qualify for island/encirclement parentage). The next mountain in line (e.g. on a long ridge), that has a lower key col and a higher prominence itself is K2. But it's further away than the Gasherbrum. Anyway I set K2 as Parent Mountain in the list--
Rupert Pupkin (
talk) 00:53, 19 December 2012 (UTC)reply
List of highest mountains also shows Gasherbrum I as parent mountain of Saser Kangri. And in that list, line parents are explicitely chosen as parent moountains.--
Rupert Pupkin (
talk) 23:09, 19 December 2012 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is part of WikiProject Mountains, a project to systematically present
information on mountains. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page (see
Contributing FAQ for more information), or visit the
project page where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.MountainsWikipedia:WikiProject MountainsTemplate:WikiProject MountainsMountain articles
The table states that the parent mountain for Sasir Kangri I is Gasherbrum; can anyone shed any light on this? Gasherbrum is about 100 miles away to the north-west. Surely Sasir Kangri I is the main peak in this sub-range, so it doesn't have a "parent peak".
Moonraker12 (
talk) 18:16, 14 December 2012 (UTC)reply
Please see the article
Topographic prominence, especially that section:
Topographic prominence#Parent Peak. You may learn that every peak has a parent unless it is the highest Peak on an island or continent. But the information in the list is arguable: Gasherbrum I is only a line parent of Saser Kangri. The prominence of G1 is less than that of SK1 (so G1 doesn't qualify for prominence parentage) and the Key Col of G1 is higher than that of SK1 (so G1 doesn't qualify for island/encirclement parentage). The next mountain in line (e.g. on a long ridge), that has a lower key col and a higher prominence itself is K2. But it's further away than the Gasherbrum. Anyway I set K2 as Parent Mountain in the list--
Rupert Pupkin (
talk) 00:53, 19 December 2012 (UTC)reply
List of highest mountains also shows Gasherbrum I as parent mountain of Saser Kangri. And in that list, line parents are explicitely chosen as parent moountains.--
Rupert Pupkin (
talk) 23:09, 19 December 2012 (UTC)reply