This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Zoroastrianism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Zoroastrianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Zoroastrianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ZoroastrianismWikipedia:WikiProject ZoroastrianismTemplate:WikiProject ZoroastrianismZoroastrianism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Religion: New religious movements Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

There is an "Account of the Sarmoun Brotherhood" by Major Desmond Martin in "Documents on Contemporary Dervish Communities", a symposium collected, edited and arranged by Roy Weaver Davidson, Octagon Press 1966, 1982. ISBN  9-86304-015-2 Parameter error in {{ ISBN}}: checksum. The article is also available on the internet. EricT ( talk) 11:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC) reply

this article filled with inaccuracies from specious sources should be deleted as those in charge refuse allowing it to be corrected - Indries Shaw and his cronies seem to have control over the content - anyone can read from james moore's biography of Gurdjieff or Gurdjieff's own works a more accurate description - legend or historic fact---so please go to the Source not the imitators (````) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.87.2.62 ( talk) 03:30, 2 June 2012 (UTC) reply