A fact from Sarah Chapone appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 July 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Sarah Chapone compares the legal situation of married women in 18th-century England to slavery in her legal treatise?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 14:23, 26 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The articles are long enough and new enough. I assume good faith on the references that I can't access. I prefer the original hook.
SL93 (
talk) 17:54, 13 July 2020 (UTC)reply
@
SL93: the original hook is a serious sea of bolded blue. How would you suggest reworking that?
Yoninah (
talk) 00:42, 24 July 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Yoninah: I didn't consider it as such because there are only two blue links. I guess ALT2: ... that in her legal treatise, Sarah Chapone compares the legal situation of married women in 18th century England to slavery?
ALT2a ... that Sarah Chapone compares the legal situation of married women in 18th century England to slavery in her legal treatise?
SL93 (
talk) 00:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC)reply
@
SL93: Why should you do this? Let the nominator fix it please.
Yoninah (
talk) 01:43, 24 July 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Yoninah: I did it because there was only one ping in your comment.
SL93 (
talk) 01:45, 24 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Sorry, I didn't mean for you to do it, I just wanted to alert you that the article is not up to snuff. I pinged the nominator now.
Yoninah (
talk) 02:00, 24 July 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Yoninah and
SL93: Does
this take care of the concerns with the lede? I'm really sorry for any trouble I've caused; thanks very much to SL93 for addressing the problem that Yoninah flagged in the hook.
AleatoryPonderings (
talk) 02:51, 24 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Thank you,
AleatoryPonderings, that certainly reads better. Restoring tick for ALT2a per SL93's review.
Yoninah (
talk) 12:02, 24 July 2020 (UTC)reply
A fact from Sarah Chapone appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 July 2020 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that Sarah Chapone compares the legal situation of married women in 18th-century England to slavery in her legal treatise?
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the
legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as
this nomination's talk page,
the article's talk page or
Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by
Yoninah (
talk) 14:23, 26 July 2020 (UTC)reply
The articles are long enough and new enough. I assume good faith on the references that I can't access. I prefer the original hook.
SL93 (
talk) 17:54, 13 July 2020 (UTC)reply
@
SL93: the original hook is a serious sea of bolded blue. How would you suggest reworking that?
Yoninah (
talk) 00:42, 24 July 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Yoninah: I didn't consider it as such because there are only two blue links. I guess ALT2: ... that in her legal treatise, Sarah Chapone compares the legal situation of married women in 18th century England to slavery?
ALT2a ... that Sarah Chapone compares the legal situation of married women in 18th century England to slavery in her legal treatise?
SL93 (
talk) 00:56, 24 July 2020 (UTC)reply
@
SL93: Why should you do this? Let the nominator fix it please.
Yoninah (
talk) 01:43, 24 July 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Yoninah: I did it because there was only one ping in your comment.
SL93 (
talk) 01:45, 24 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Sorry, I didn't mean for you to do it, I just wanted to alert you that the article is not up to snuff. I pinged the nominator now.
Yoninah (
talk) 02:00, 24 July 2020 (UTC)reply
@
Yoninah and
SL93: Does
this take care of the concerns with the lede? I'm really sorry for any trouble I've caused; thanks very much to SL93 for addressing the problem that Yoninah flagged in the hook.
AleatoryPonderings (
talk) 02:51, 24 July 2020 (UTC)reply
Thank you,
AleatoryPonderings, that certainly reads better. Restoring tick for ALT2a per SL93's review.
Yoninah (
talk) 12:02, 24 July 2020 (UTC)reply