This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The main difference between the two versions ( [1] and [2]) appears to be these:
which were described as discriminatory and filled with violence were discussed publicly")
I will note that as a native English speaker I find the phrasing "which were described as discriminatory and filled with violence were discussed publicly
" circuitous to the point of being confusing.
Mackensen
(talk)
03:47, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Sarah-Lee Heinrich's "disgustingly white majority" was not one of the discussed teenager tweets, but another incident.
As the welt.de (major German newspaper) writes: "Die aktuelle Vorsitzende der Grünen Jugend war volljährig, als sie von einer „ekligen weißen Mehrheitsgesellschaft“ sprach."
(Translation: "The chairwoman of the Green Youth was an adult, when she talked about a 'disgustingly white majority society'").
So if the discussion in the German article talk page was focused on her teenager tweets, not that grossly racist comment, then how is the "let's not mention the Tweets she made as a kid" relevant to the inclusion of the comment that she made as an adult?
We would include reported grossly racist comments by other politicians, so why does Sarah-Lee Heinrich get protection?
On another note: I'm not sure why TheRandomIP focuses on "we decided almost unanimous to only passively describe the tweets", when the tweets were made as a teenager and the "disgustingly white majority" was made as an adult. TheRandomIP was notified about this distinction in the German article's talk page, but they keep continuing to misunderstand the situation. Also I'm not sure why TheRandomIP tries to dismiss the reporting about it as "tabloid newspaper" (even though I referenced welt.de) and singles out "far-right" criticism. The far-right might have an issue with it, because it's racism against whites, but in addition to that it's still racism, which is opposed by centrist, left-leaning and traditional leftists on principle.
Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral, not a ministry of truth that memory holes offenses by racist politicians, if they are a high-ranking member of the correct party. -- 2A00:6020:B3B0:5300:64B0:DE51:9847:D940 ( talk) 06:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove the external links to social media per WP:NOSOCIAL. In this case, I am concerned it's used for harassment as well. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:53, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The main difference between the two versions ( [1] and [2]) appears to be these:
which were described as discriminatory and filled with violence were discussed publicly")
I will note that as a native English speaker I find the phrasing "which were described as discriminatory and filled with violence were discussed publicly
" circuitous to the point of being confusing.
Mackensen
(talk)
03:47, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
Sarah-Lee Heinrich's "disgustingly white majority" was not one of the discussed teenager tweets, but another incident.
As the welt.de (major German newspaper) writes: "Die aktuelle Vorsitzende der Grünen Jugend war volljährig, als sie von einer „ekligen weißen Mehrheitsgesellschaft“ sprach."
(Translation: "The chairwoman of the Green Youth was an adult, when she talked about a 'disgustingly white majority society'").
So if the discussion in the German article talk page was focused on her teenager tweets, not that grossly racist comment, then how is the "let's not mention the Tweets she made as a kid" relevant to the inclusion of the comment that she made as an adult?
We would include reported grossly racist comments by other politicians, so why does Sarah-Lee Heinrich get protection?
On another note: I'm not sure why TheRandomIP focuses on "we decided almost unanimous to only passively describe the tweets", when the tweets were made as a teenager and the "disgustingly white majority" was made as an adult. TheRandomIP was notified about this distinction in the German article's talk page, but they keep continuing to misunderstand the situation. Also I'm not sure why TheRandomIP tries to dismiss the reporting about it as "tabloid newspaper" (even though I referenced welt.de) and singles out "far-right" criticism. The far-right might have an issue with it, because it's racism against whites, but in addition to that it's still racism, which is opposed by centrist, left-leaning and traditional leftists on principle.
Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral, not a ministry of truth that memory holes offenses by racist politicians, if they are a high-ranking member of the correct party. -- 2A00:6020:B3B0:5300:64B0:DE51:9847:D940 ( talk) 06:07, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove the external links to social media per WP:NOSOCIAL. In this case, I am concerned it's used for harassment as well. ~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 12:53, 12 November 2021 (UTC)