This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

West Midlands Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject West Midlands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of West Midlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.West MidlandsWikipedia:WikiProject West MidlandsTemplate:WikiProject West MidlandsWest Midlands articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Libraries Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page should not be speedily deleted because it is a perfectly sound article on a notable subject (compare similar articles on small archives services such as Barnsley Archives and Local Studies or Hull History Centre). The editor who created it is a new editor who clearly has lessons to learn about COI issues (or perhaps just about choosing a more anonymous username), but that is no reason to condemn this article. The argument that there have been "no substantial edits by others", besides being untrue, is ridiculous: the article was created less than 24 hours ago. GrindtXX ( talk) 12:03, 18 April 2015 (UTC) reply