This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Novels: 19th century Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by 19th century task force. This article has an incomplete infobox template! - see Novels InfoboxCode or Short Story InfoboxCode for a pattern. This article has an infobox template in need of a Cover! (prefer 1st edition) Women writers Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Sanditon be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Some thoughts:

• Should the page numbers be in here? They'll differ in every edition of the novel.
• Is the section I marked as a "plot summary" really an analysis? And since it's unsourced, is this original research? I'm not familiar enough with the work to answer that.

| Klaw ¡digame! 23:15, 31 December 2005 (UTC) Yes, it's not a plot summary at all - it's a critical appraisal of one very minor part of the book. reply

• I am reading Sanditon at the moment and am nearly done, and once I find out where the second author picked up to finish it I'll be happy to write an actual summary. 128.226.37.168 ( talk) 14:53, 12 November 2008 (UTC) reply

In the last entry on the "Continuations" section, there appears >>,--Purdicles (talk) 22:06, 17 April 2009 (UTC)<<, of which I am rather sure it shows there by mistake. Also, this entry seems to have been disrupted, or some part is simply missing at the end. Since I am no native speaker of English and very new to the project, I am unsure what to do about it. Segelohr101 ( talk) 14:49, 19 April 2009 (UTC) reply

• There is a definite need for cleanup. While the article is well-written, and its observations are quite thoughtful, it is clear to me that this article reads as if it were an academic essay on Sanditon rather than an encyclopedia entry. Victorianist ( talk) 18:19, 26 May 2010 (UTC) reply
• Is there an error in the first line of the article? "...also known as Sand and Sandition" -- surely "Sandition" must be a misprint for Sanditon? There is no such word as sandition! 95.149.104.87 ( talk) 19:19, 12 May 2011 (UTC) reply
  • It's almost certainly spurious; I've removed it. Shimgray | talk | 14:42, 12 January 2012 (UTC) reply