A news item involving Sanaa crowd crush was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 21 April 2023.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Death Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Disaster management Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Yemen Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Yemen, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Yemen on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YemenWikipedia:WikiProject YemenTemplate:WikiProject YemenYemen articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

I had added text about the compensation Houthis have announced, quoting per sources. I now see that an editor took the liberty to calculate their own Rial-USD -conversion and alter the metrics.The person didnt describe their edit in the edit summary, so I dont know who it was, but left this commentary in non-wikitext : -- separate conversion rate based on Oanda and XE, which checks out with CNN conversions later in article. Reuters-stated $9 may have meant $19 and cannot be confirmed in other sources. --!

This doubles the amount. I think this may not be proper, we shouldnt second guess Reuters MSN Democracy Now , all of whom refer to 9$ . I am going to revert this to 9$ Wuerzele ( talk) 22:33, 23 April 2023 (UTC) reply