This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Archaeology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Paranormal Low‑importance This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Skepticism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States: Wyoming Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Wyoming.

Tail vs Tale? Look like it was written by a Junior High Student 68.190.236.47 ( talk) 19:13, 15 June 2022 (UTC) reply

This is misleading. 185.90.171.251 ( talk) 15:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC) reply

Especially as he had a full set of teeth, something that an infant, with or without anencenphaly, do not have, and he also had solid food in his stomach (meat) ; from article :

"However, without Pedro’s body, it cannot be proven he suffered from the same condition- especially as there is evidence that suggests Pedro was not a child at all.

Pedro’s full height has been estimated to be 14 inches in total- certainly the right size for a baby. However, he also exhibited features associated with a fully-grown adult. The mummy had a full set of teeth and x rays also revealed what appeared to be the remains of solid food in his stomach. Furthermore, there were signs on his body that he did not die a natural death. The mummy’s spine appeared to be damaged, his collarbone broken and his skull been smashed by a blow that could have resulted in the exposed brain tissue."

https://historycollection.com/truth-behind-disturbing-mystery-san-pedro-mountains-mummy/ Okama-San ( talk) 02:00, 15 September 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Okama-San I don't mean to be rude, but why should we use that website? It doesn't seem to meet WP:RS. I can't even find an "about" page. But anencephaly is 100% fatal and the longest a baby is known to have lived is 2 years, so clearly very relevant to its height. Doug Weller talk 08:28, 15 September 2023 (UTC) reply

@ Ceoil: Why did you cut the entire post-discovery history, including the analysis that substantiates the mummy's being an anencephalic infant, and the full name of "Gill"? Much of the intro is now unsupported in the text. Yngvadottir ( talk) 22:44, 21 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the self-revert; I've added another source from WikiProject Archaeology and made some other tweaks. Yngvadottir ( talk) 10:01, 23 April 2024 (UTC) reply

New changes look good. Apologies for being so hasty in making the first cuts, and to say your an editor I have held in high regard over the years. Ceoil ( talk) 08:12, 24 April 2024 (UTC) reply