GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will ( talk · contribs) 02:37, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
With a few grammatical tweaks having been made, the article now complies with MOS policies on grammar, structure, and general layout. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! ( talk) 02:06, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
The article has a healthy list of reliable sources in its bibliography; it makes frequent use of them and doesn't seem to contain any original research. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! ( talk) 02:05, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
It looks as though the article covers all necessary aspects of its topic; its coverage is thorough and relevant. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! ( talk) 02:04, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
The article does not exhibit any bias concerning its subject. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! ( talk) 02:02, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Since the article's creation, it does not seem to have undergone any edit warring or disruptive editing. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! ( talk) 17:32, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
The several images used are all public domain, and relevantly illustrate the article. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! ( talk) 17:33, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Ping-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 13:49, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
After checking this article against the criteria, I am satisfied it qualifies for GA-status. Congratulations! :) One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! ( talk) 02:07, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will ( talk · contribs) 02:37, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
With a few grammatical tweaks having been made, the article now complies with MOS policies on grammar, structure, and general layout. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! ( talk) 02:06, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
The article has a healthy list of reliable sources in its bibliography; it makes frequent use of them and doesn't seem to contain any original research. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! ( talk) 02:05, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
It looks as though the article covers all necessary aspects of its topic; its coverage is thorough and relevant. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! ( talk) 02:04, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
The article does not exhibit any bias concerning its subject. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! ( talk) 02:02, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
Since the article's creation, it does not seem to have undergone any edit warring or disruptive editing. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! ( talk) 17:32, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
The several images used are all public domain, and relevantly illustrate the article. One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! ( talk) 17:33, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Ping-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 13:49, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
After checking this article against the criteria, I am satisfied it qualifies for GA-status. Congratulations! :) One hand on the mouse, one hand on the keyboard... and the feet can do the rest! Hee-hee! ( talk) 02:07, 1 April 2015 (UTC)