![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Willmcw - Care to source your last edit? It's described as "The observatory has never ceased being used. Individual telescopes are another matter" but I sure don't see anything sourcing this. Both of the links are dead and neither is about any observatory. You'll also need to identify the statement that it never ceased being used by citing an astronomer or other qualified expert there who holds that position, seeing as the information needs to be reliable and verifiable. Otherwise I suppose, as an editor once said, it should be removed. Patiently awaiting your compliance... Rangerdude 04:00, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Just as with any unsourced edit, it is liable to be removed by other editors who believe it is inaccurate. If I wanted it to stay, then I'd provide a verifiable source. My lack of a source is an indication of my minimal interest. If this was a subject that I cared more about, if this was a fact that I thought was important to the article, then I would certainly provide one or more sources. - Willmcw 20:44, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Both articles indicate that one is inside the other, but which way is it? Maps show the San Gabriel Mountains inside of Angeles National Forest. Travisk 20:14, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Word on the street is that it has been declared a "National Monument", but it is all happening too fast and it looks like this particular Wiki page is not caught up on that fact, yet. Here is one blog with some info: http://geotripper.blogspot.com/2014/10/san-gabriel-mountains-national-monument.html
AND i notice it's mentioned on this brand new Wiki page, too: /info/en/?search=San_Gabriel_Mountains_National_Monument
Seems like it should probably be mentioned on the front page of this article, but I normally do not edit front pages, Thank-You!!! Lesbrown99 ( talk) 00:58, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
I have a copy of the Environmental Impact Report for the Caltrans evaluation for reconnecting Highway 39 to Angeles Crest which the extant article notes "citation needed." Question: If such a lengthy PDF file which discusses the proposed roadwork and its impact on the flora, fauna, and habitat considered to be a suitable citation, do you think? If so, I can add the citation. Thanks! Damotclese ( talk) 16:34, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Willmcw - Care to source your last edit? It's described as "The observatory has never ceased being used. Individual telescopes are another matter" but I sure don't see anything sourcing this. Both of the links are dead and neither is about any observatory. You'll also need to identify the statement that it never ceased being used by citing an astronomer or other qualified expert there who holds that position, seeing as the information needs to be reliable and verifiable. Otherwise I suppose, as an editor once said, it should be removed. Patiently awaiting your compliance... Rangerdude 04:00, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Just as with any unsourced edit, it is liable to be removed by other editors who believe it is inaccurate. If I wanted it to stay, then I'd provide a verifiable source. My lack of a source is an indication of my minimal interest. If this was a subject that I cared more about, if this was a fact that I thought was important to the article, then I would certainly provide one or more sources. - Willmcw 20:44, 16 Feb 2005 (UTC)
Both articles indicate that one is inside the other, but which way is it? Maps show the San Gabriel Mountains inside of Angeles National Forest. Travisk 20:14, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Word on the street is that it has been declared a "National Monument", but it is all happening too fast and it looks like this particular Wiki page is not caught up on that fact, yet. Here is one blog with some info: http://geotripper.blogspot.com/2014/10/san-gabriel-mountains-national-monument.html
AND i notice it's mentioned on this brand new Wiki page, too: /info/en/?search=San_Gabriel_Mountains_National_Monument
Seems like it should probably be mentioned on the front page of this article, but I normally do not edit front pages, Thank-You!!! Lesbrown99 ( talk) 00:58, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
I have a copy of the Environmental Impact Report for the Caltrans evaluation for reconnecting Highway 39 to Angeles Crest which the extant article notes "citation needed." Question: If such a lengthy PDF file which discusses the proposed roadwork and its impact on the flora, fauna, and habitat considered to be a suitable citation, do you think? If so, I can add the citation. Thanks! Damotclese ( talk) 16:34, 5 October 2015 (UTC)