This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Museums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Italy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It seems like SanGimignano1300 in the spring of 2013 is having hard times. As mentioned in the article the city is exposed to public, sun and rain (if not covered), outside in the back yard. As seen by a yearly May visitor (me), the change leaves room for worry of the fate of these pieces of art. Øyvind Teig ( talk) 06:57, 22 May 2013 (UTC) reply

I did add a reference to my blog note with pictures called "SanGimignano1300" in the article proper. That blog takes a rather "lexical" view of the relocation, with mostly paste of text from the Wikipedia page, plus the pictures. That blog will only ever refer to the relocation situation. It also points to a movie of still pictures called "Sunrise in SanGimignano1300" on YouTube that I made. I would like advice if it would be better to place some of the pictures on Wikipedia commons. I have shot the pictures, but I am uncertain if I can depict the model city there. Please remove my ref in the article proper if you think it is wrong to have it there. Øyvind Teig ( talk) 19:58, 9 June 2013 (UTC) reply