This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
P Surendra Rulz ( talk) 15:23, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Notice about Samsung Galaxy Note 7 devices (29986812710).jpg has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons, with relevant discussion taking place at the deletion nomination page. - Mardus / talk 05:48, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Use of 'the' in "the Galaxy Note 7" is often superfluous in most situations. Use either of the following:
Because Galaxy Note 7 is not short enough for use with the 'the' article; while Note 7 and S7 (as short constructs) really are that short that they do require a 'the' before them.
That respectable native-English-language publications use the wrong construct of "the Galaxy Note 7", does not make the construct less incorrect grammatically. - Mardus / talk 11:23, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
I don't know where you picked up this stuff, Mardus, but you're wrong on all counts: the definite article is required, except in cases such as when it's used as an adjunct; whether the name is abbreviated is irrelevant; and product names don't get italicized. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 22:15, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Here I'd made changes in the Air travel advisories section, and renamed it to "Air travel advisories, subsequent ban".
Perhaps it would make more sense to move the 'complete ban of the device from airplanes' into a new section that would follow the second recall section, but before "Effect on Samsung". - Mardus / talk 12:59, 13 October 2016 (UTC) im.
The first paragraph in the reception section comes off way too negative. As far as I know, before the recall, the device was extremely well received by reviewers, but the reception section doesn't give that impression at all. 192.19.255.250 ( talk) 00:03, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
I've seen that device has not the Samsung logo as other devices and got an unofficial Nougat update. Galaxy Note 7 will never ever get Nougat update due to a discontinued product.
IMPORTANT: Someone will have to upload a REAL Note 7 photo.
TheWikiContributor (
talk)
18:28, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
I disagree with this suggestion. In general the battery issue was big enough to potentially warrent its own article. But, because the battery issue was the only thing that happened with this phone, there's not enough content for two seperate articles. To address this suggestion I was bold and created a new redirect page called Battery faults of the Samsung Galaxy Note 7 that redirect directly to the battery section of this article. I'll leave the suggestion here for now, but if no one expresses a problem, then I'll eventually delete the suggestion. Jean15paul ( talk) 21:20, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Samsung Galaxy Note 7 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
P Surendra Rulz ( talk) 15:23, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
File:Notice about Samsung Galaxy Note 7 devices (29986812710).jpg has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons, with relevant discussion taking place at the deletion nomination page. - Mardus / talk 05:48, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
Use of 'the' in "the Galaxy Note 7" is often superfluous in most situations. Use either of the following:
Because Galaxy Note 7 is not short enough for use with the 'the' article; while Note 7 and S7 (as short constructs) really are that short that they do require a 'the' before them.
That respectable native-English-language publications use the wrong construct of "the Galaxy Note 7", does not make the construct less incorrect grammatically. - Mardus / talk 11:23, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
I don't know where you picked up this stuff, Mardus, but you're wrong on all counts: the definite article is required, except in cases such as when it's used as an adjunct; whether the name is abbreviated is irrelevant; and product names don't get italicized. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 22:15, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Here I'd made changes in the Air travel advisories section, and renamed it to "Air travel advisories, subsequent ban".
Perhaps it would make more sense to move the 'complete ban of the device from airplanes' into a new section that would follow the second recall section, but before "Effect on Samsung". - Mardus / talk 12:59, 13 October 2016 (UTC) im.
The first paragraph in the reception section comes off way too negative. As far as I know, before the recall, the device was extremely well received by reviewers, but the reception section doesn't give that impression at all. 192.19.255.250 ( talk) 00:03, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
I've seen that device has not the Samsung logo as other devices and got an unofficial Nougat update. Galaxy Note 7 will never ever get Nougat update due to a discontinued product.
IMPORTANT: Someone will have to upload a REAL Note 7 photo.
TheWikiContributor (
talk)
18:28, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
I disagree with this suggestion. In general the battery issue was big enough to potentially warrent its own article. But, because the battery issue was the only thing that happened with this phone, there's not enough content for two seperate articles. To address this suggestion I was bold and created a new redirect page called Battery faults of the Samsung Galaxy Note 7 that redirect directly to the battery section of this article. I'll leave the suggestion here for now, but if no one expresses a problem, then I'll eventually delete the suggestion. Jean15paul ( talk) 21:20, 29 March 2017 (UTC)