Ah, thanks. I assumed (here, wrongly) that a turning point in the development re. dance parties would inevitably be a turning point when considering the style as a whole.
Kingsif (
talk)
15:05, 18 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The article doesn't appear to have a standardization of either "samba rock" or "samba-rock", which both appear. Both may be correct, but consistency through article would be nice.
"...representative of this contingent in the contemporary MPB scene" isn't clear on whether Ben is representative of his era of music within the modern world, or of the genre altogether. More info is needed, and a more layman-friendly term to replace 'contingent' would be appreciated to aid average readers' understanding
Article says the genre "reemerged" in the 2000s, without covering where it went (or indeed, that it did lose popularity at all) - missing info? Or is "reemerged" not the appropriate word (see style)
Though what it can have is defined by RS, GA's do have a standard set of criteria that would want the coverage to not be lacking if the information is known (which is assumed to be published in RS's), and as a non-expert I found areas where I felt the coverage should be more. Having said that, reading it now it seems good. Thanks for the updates :)
Fail - more coverage of certain areas recognized as needed
Ah, thanks. I assumed (here, wrongly) that a turning point in the development re. dance parties would inevitably be a turning point when considering the style as a whole.
Kingsif (
talk)
15:05, 18 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The article doesn't appear to have a standardization of either "samba rock" or "samba-rock", which both appear. Both may be correct, but consistency through article would be nice.
"...representative of this contingent in the contemporary MPB scene" isn't clear on whether Ben is representative of his era of music within the modern world, or of the genre altogether. More info is needed, and a more layman-friendly term to replace 'contingent' would be appreciated to aid average readers' understanding
Article says the genre "reemerged" in the 2000s, without covering where it went (or indeed, that it did lose popularity at all) - missing info? Or is "reemerged" not the appropriate word (see style)
Though what it can have is defined by RS, GA's do have a standard set of criteria that would want the coverage to not be lacking if the information is known (which is assumed to be published in RS's), and as a non-expert I found areas where I felt the coverage should be more. Having said that, reading it now it seems good. Thanks for the updates :)
Fail - more coverage of certain areas recognized as needed