From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2017

The source provided (Daylight as a Design Strategy in the Ottoman Mosques of Tunisia and Algeria) does not describe this Mosque as an Ottoman mosque. The misrepresentation of the source and the fact that the editor keeps introducing irrelevant foreign equivalents in the lead (despite having been made aware of both issues in the past) is simply unacceptable. I kept the added source for the date and removed the WP:OR. M.Bitton ( talk) 23:10, 26 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Oh come on, your edits are beginning to look very silly. The table says "Table 1: The studied corpus of Ottoman mosques in Tunisia and Algeria" so clearly the authors are listing Salah as an Ottoman mosque. O.celebi ( talk) 18:49, 27 June 2017 (UTC) reply
What you're doing is called "original research". I suggest you familiarize yourself with WP:OR. M.Bitton ( talk) 22:56, 27 June 2017 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2017

The source provided (Daylight as a Design Strategy in the Ottoman Mosques of Tunisia and Algeria) does not describe this Mosque as an Ottoman mosque. The misrepresentation of the source and the fact that the editor keeps introducing irrelevant foreign equivalents in the lead (despite having been made aware of both issues in the past) is simply unacceptable. I kept the added source for the date and removed the WP:OR. M.Bitton ( talk) 23:10, 26 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Oh come on, your edits are beginning to look very silly. The table says "Table 1: The studied corpus of Ottoman mosques in Tunisia and Algeria" so clearly the authors are listing Salah as an Ottoman mosque. O.celebi ( talk) 18:49, 27 June 2017 (UTC) reply
What you're doing is called "original research". I suggest you familiarize yourself with WP:OR. M.Bitton ( talk) 22:56, 27 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook