This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Algeria Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Algeria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Algeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AlgeriaWikipedia:WikiProject AlgeriaTemplate:WikiProject AlgeriaAlgeria articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Islam: Mosques Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Mosques task force.

The source provided (Daylight as a Design Strategy in the Ottoman Mosques of Tunisia and Algeria) does not describe this Mosque as an Ottoman mosque. The misrepresentation of the source and the fact that the editor keeps introducing irrelevant foreign equivalents in the lead (despite having been made aware of both issues in the past) is simply unacceptable. I kept the added source for the date and removed the WP:OR. M.Bitton ( talk) 23:10, 26 June 2017 (UTC) reply

Oh come on, your edits are beginning to look very silly. The table says "Table 1: The studied corpus of Ottoman mosques in Tunisia and Algeria" so clearly the authors are listing Salah as an Ottoman mosque. O.celebi ( talk) 18:49, 27 June 2017 (UTC) reply

What you're doing is called "original research". I suggest you familiarize yourself with WP:OR. M.Bitton ( talk) 22:56, 27 June 2017 (UTC) reply