![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Could someone explain what "Sakura" means, please? - Eyeresist 03:29, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
ANCEA should be split off into its own entery -- TheFarix 21:57, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
I've put all of the information about ANCEA in the trivia section for now. It should be fine there until someone with enough knowledge creates a stub for it. But for now, there just isn't enough to justify a separate article. -- TheFarix 00:12, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Actually, the point is now moot, since recently they voted to merge the two entities into a single board. Roninbk 17:16, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Could somebody please redirect the titles "Sakura Con" and "Sakuracon" so that they come to this page. "Sakura-Con" is the correct spelling but we (ANCEA) own the copywrite to all three spellings. Alinda Sue 19:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
http://www.dreamtheaterforums.com/index.php?topic=20345.0 Looks like a Dream Theater internet forum wanted to add their own little picture -- 71.141.108.78 06:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Whoever keeps removing the picture, please stop. Revert wars are dumb. If you have a problem, discuss it. Constantly deleting it makes YOU the vandal. 68.36.93.133 21:58, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Grr, tried to revert to a version without vandalism, but I only reverted to one that has less vandalism (and was deeper in the page), but it should have done enough to make manual cleanup easier. -- Alphamone ( talk) 22:04, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure if the current format/organization of the links to this data is appropriate here. Maybe it should be changed into prose? Or even something like: AnimeCons.con Data - 1998 1999 2000, etc. Kopf1988 22:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
I think the infamous Sakura-Con 2009 commercial has to be mentioned, even if it's just the fact that it became an Internet meme. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.129.2.148 ( talk) 02:32, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
What the Hell is all thGIRUGAMESH about? 86.43.178.17 ( talk) 17:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
I would like to discuss the removal of the (with parents) in regards to infants attending the con. I believe the comment is necessary to help point out that a minor policy is in place for the convention. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SeijinDinger ( talk • contribs) 09:20, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
I know some of Sakura-Con's staffers monitor this article, so I like to request that they list any coverage the convention has received from reliable, third-party sources. In particular, sources that detail the history of the convention, describes the convention's and programming, documented influences, and if possible, the organizational structure. I like to try to see if I can expand this article a bit more with these sources and hopefully get close to it being classed as a Good Article. -- Farix ( Talk) 22:31, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Remember to maintain this article as written from a neutral, encyclopedic perspective. It's looking pretty good right now, but articles like these have a tendency to become more like advertisements or promotions (especially with Sakura-Con staff being able to edit the article). Just be aware of that as you make edits; be especially careful that you're not making the article biased. Sometimes it comes down to something as simple as, for example, a phrase like "fun activities" being replaced with "activities", because the "fun" descriptor is opinionated and biased in favor of the activities. 24.15.197.87 ( talk) 04:19, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Upon further examination, I saw that the "Programming" section needed to be rewritten for neutrality. I did so, while retaining all of the included information (which needs to be citated--see below). 24.15.197.87 ( talk) 04:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
All articles on Wikipedia must have citations to verify information. This one is lacking them, especially in the "Programming" section, where there are no citations at all (but a lot of presented facts). If you're a moderator of the event, and you add information because you've planned it, at least cite yourself. 24.15.197.87 ( talk) 05:49, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
16,586 is the correct number as being released with the permission of the Director of Membership we are currently re-working the history page on the Sakura-Con website and hope to have that up and running shortly SeijinDinger ( talk) 20:39, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
If the Sakura-Con and the organization that support it is trying to educate people about Asian culture, why is it mainly about Japan? It sounds like this is more of a Japanese convention than an "East Asian" convention. Can anyone mind explaining this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.112.94.226 ( talk) 01:56, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Could someone explain what "Sakura" means, please? - Eyeresist 03:29, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
ANCEA should be split off into its own entery -- TheFarix 21:57, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
I've put all of the information about ANCEA in the trivia section for now. It should be fine there until someone with enough knowledge creates a stub for it. But for now, there just isn't enough to justify a separate article. -- TheFarix 00:12, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Actually, the point is now moot, since recently they voted to merge the two entities into a single board. Roninbk 17:16, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Could somebody please redirect the titles "Sakura Con" and "Sakuracon" so that they come to this page. "Sakura-Con" is the correct spelling but we (ANCEA) own the copywrite to all three spellings. Alinda Sue 19:03, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
http://www.dreamtheaterforums.com/index.php?topic=20345.0 Looks like a Dream Theater internet forum wanted to add their own little picture -- 71.141.108.78 06:51, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
Whoever keeps removing the picture, please stop. Revert wars are dumb. If you have a problem, discuss it. Constantly deleting it makes YOU the vandal. 68.36.93.133 21:58, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Grr, tried to revert to a version without vandalism, but I only reverted to one that has less vandalism (and was deeper in the page), but it should have done enough to make manual cleanup easier. -- Alphamone ( talk) 22:04, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure if the current format/organization of the links to this data is appropriate here. Maybe it should be changed into prose? Or even something like: AnimeCons.con Data - 1998 1999 2000, etc. Kopf1988 22:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
I think the infamous Sakura-Con 2009 commercial has to be mentioned, even if it's just the fact that it became an Internet meme. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.129.2.148 ( talk) 02:32, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
What the Hell is all thGIRUGAMESH about? 86.43.178.17 ( talk) 17:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
I would like to discuss the removal of the (with parents) in regards to infants attending the con. I believe the comment is necessary to help point out that a minor policy is in place for the convention. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SeijinDinger ( talk • contribs) 09:20, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
I know some of Sakura-Con's staffers monitor this article, so I like to request that they list any coverage the convention has received from reliable, third-party sources. In particular, sources that detail the history of the convention, describes the convention's and programming, documented influences, and if possible, the organizational structure. I like to try to see if I can expand this article a bit more with these sources and hopefully get close to it being classed as a Good Article. -- Farix ( Talk) 22:31, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Remember to maintain this article as written from a neutral, encyclopedic perspective. It's looking pretty good right now, but articles like these have a tendency to become more like advertisements or promotions (especially with Sakura-Con staff being able to edit the article). Just be aware of that as you make edits; be especially careful that you're not making the article biased. Sometimes it comes down to something as simple as, for example, a phrase like "fun activities" being replaced with "activities", because the "fun" descriptor is opinionated and biased in favor of the activities. 24.15.197.87 ( talk) 04:19, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
Upon further examination, I saw that the "Programming" section needed to be rewritten for neutrality. I did so, while retaining all of the included information (which needs to be citated--see below). 24.15.197.87 ( talk) 04:28, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
All articles on Wikipedia must have citations to verify information. This one is lacking them, especially in the "Programming" section, where there are no citations at all (but a lot of presented facts). If you're a moderator of the event, and you add information because you've planned it, at least cite yourself. 24.15.197.87 ( talk) 05:49, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
16,586 is the correct number as being released with the permission of the Director of Membership we are currently re-working the history page on the Sakura-Con website and hope to have that up and running shortly SeijinDinger ( talk) 20:39, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
If the Sakura-Con and the organization that support it is trying to educate people about Asian culture, why is it mainly about Japan? It sounds like this is more of a Japanese convention than an "East Asian" convention. Can anyone mind explaining this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.112.94.226 ( talk) 01:56, 9 November 2010 (UTC)