![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
![]() | This article contains a translation of Saintignon (Adelsgeschlecht) from de.wikipedia. |
![]() | This article contains a translation of Famille de Saintignon from fr.wikipedia. |
hi there! thanks for reaching out!
I am a member of this family and I dont think I have contributed anything that makes it a conflict of interest. I am very invested in my lineage and want it to be as fairly and accurately represented. the instagram I can agree with, however, my father and i's addition to the family tree is not fallacious. instead it just adds onto the living branch of the family and puts us on the map with our ancestors. I haven't added anything that exaggerates the legacy or detracts from it, just trying to make it more accurate.
thank you for the concern and I would be happy to discuss it further if you'd like!
Sincerely, Vicente de Saintignon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vicente Saintignon ( talk • contribs) 06:45, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
note to: User:Melcous, User:Equirax, User:Vicente_Saintignon
There are people who think that the Saintignon family is notable and there are people who think otherwise. How to solve this ? The answer, as usual, is from reading what reliable sources are saying... and discussing the issues here, at the talk page. It is not too difficult to discover that the opinions at both fr:Famille_de_Saintignon and de:Saintignon [1] are: notable topic. Both pages are backed up by a large number of references. Therefore, the pure and simple removal of quite all the named people in the en:wp article doesn't seem justified... but their pure and simple reinclusion will not solve the matter. Therefore, I propose the following: let us reinstall the list under discussion for say a week (till 2018-11-21)... it was here at least from 2013, there is no emergency..., AND see if the "includers" use or not this delay to import the references from fr:wp and de:wp. Pldx1 ( talk) 12:38, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
References
Dear
User:Vicente Saintignon. You have said just above I am very invested in my lineage
. I would be interested by documents giving further details about the four
Do you have any clue about finding more documents on this topic ? Best regards. Pldx1 ( talk) 09:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
|
![]() | This article contains a translation of Saintignon (Adelsgeschlecht) from de.wikipedia. |
![]() | This article contains a translation of Famille de Saintignon from fr.wikipedia. |
hi there! thanks for reaching out!
I am a member of this family and I dont think I have contributed anything that makes it a conflict of interest. I am very invested in my lineage and want it to be as fairly and accurately represented. the instagram I can agree with, however, my father and i's addition to the family tree is not fallacious. instead it just adds onto the living branch of the family and puts us on the map with our ancestors. I haven't added anything that exaggerates the legacy or detracts from it, just trying to make it more accurate.
thank you for the concern and I would be happy to discuss it further if you'd like!
Sincerely, Vicente de Saintignon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vicente Saintignon ( talk • contribs) 06:45, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
note to: User:Melcous, User:Equirax, User:Vicente_Saintignon
There are people who think that the Saintignon family is notable and there are people who think otherwise. How to solve this ? The answer, as usual, is from reading what reliable sources are saying... and discussing the issues here, at the talk page. It is not too difficult to discover that the opinions at both fr:Famille_de_Saintignon and de:Saintignon [1] are: notable topic. Both pages are backed up by a large number of references. Therefore, the pure and simple removal of quite all the named people in the en:wp article doesn't seem justified... but their pure and simple reinclusion will not solve the matter. Therefore, I propose the following: let us reinstall the list under discussion for say a week (till 2018-11-21)... it was here at least from 2013, there is no emergency..., AND see if the "includers" use or not this delay to import the references from fr:wp and de:wp. Pldx1 ( talk) 12:38, 14 November 2018 (UTC)
References
Dear
User:Vicente Saintignon. You have said just above I am very invested in my lineage
. I would be interested by documents giving further details about the four
Do you have any clue about finding more documents on this topic ? Best regards. Pldx1 ( talk) 09:26, 16 November 2018 (UTC)