I will make notes as I go. Can I suggest you add responses to the relevant sections, to make it easier to see what has been done, and what still needs to be done. I will review the lead at the end, once the main body of the article has been checked.
References
There are a few problems here.
Ref 1 is dead. Unfortunately it is used 14 times. It may be available on an archive.
Fixed - alternative source found for the image.
Mjroots (
talk)
Ref 46 Aeroclub du Boulonnais no longer finds the relevant page and is redirected to the home page.
Fixed - fortunately ref 47 gave the date too.
Mjroots (
talk)
Location
Are there any details of its area available?
Not exactly sure what you mean here. The airfield's location between the two villages is given, and its location in relation to the nearest major town in given. Coordinates already appear in the infobox, but could be added here if desired.
Mjroots (
talk)
06:18, 5 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Well, the lede does say that it's a GA airfield, and the runway length is given in the infobox. I've not seen any source that gives the total area of the airfield.
Mjroots (
talk)
08:55, 5 April 2012 (UTC)reply
If it is not available, that is fine.
First World War
"flying the Handley Page O/400" sounds like there was only one of them. Suggest "flying Handley Page O/400 aircraft" or somesuch.
I am not objecting to chronological order. The issue is whether the text reads well. Since you have mentioned it, I note that the Lympne GA review picked up on the same issue, suggesting that a good copyedit was required. Some conjunctions, introductory phrases and linking text would help the flow considerably.
Several mentions of "it was notified". Is this a formal process connected with airfields? If so, it needs a little explanation on first occurence.
The phrase "it was notified" means that an
Notice to Airmen had been issued. A formal process of the relevant Civil Aviation Authority (DGAC or CAA as appropriate in this case). The term is already wikilinked earlier in the paragraph. Would a second wikilink be of benifit here?
Mjroots (
talk)
06:28, 5 April 2012 (UTC)reply
I don't think a second wikilink is necessary. It is not clear that "it was notified" implies that a Notice to Airmen was issued. Your text above is what is required. Somethink to link "it was notified" and "notice to airmen" and "Civil Aviation Authority" together, so that readers carry on reading, rather than clicking to find out what it means. Having read the article, the reader should be able to understand what "it was notified" means. For the details of how it works, they can follow the link. (again, same issue was raised for Lympne GAR).
Final para is all "On [date] ..." It needs variety, and maybe an intro: "The airfield was used by several notable people ..." to link the bits together.
That para covers events in 1935 and 1936. I though that it was better to combine the two years rather than have two very short paras for each year.
Mjroots (
talk)
06:57, 5 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Bigger para is good. So then, "Several notable people visited the airfield in 1935 and 1936, including ..." might work. Again, it is the flow of the text, not its structure that needs tweaking.
Is the new hanger still planned or has it been built? (Or don't we know?)
We don't know. The Google Earth images covering Saint-Inglevert are dated 2002 and there is some cloud cover obscuring the area where the hangars are. Nothing on Flickr either - wish there was a Geograph France! We can assume that it was built, but without evidence to support it saying it definitely was built is
WP:OR.
Mjroots (
talk)
07:28, 7 April 2012 (UTC)reply
I will make notes as I go. Can I suggest you add responses to the relevant sections, to make it easier to see what has been done, and what still needs to be done. I will review the lead at the end, once the main body of the article has been checked.
References
There are a few problems here.
Ref 1 is dead. Unfortunately it is used 14 times. It may be available on an archive.
Fixed - alternative source found for the image.
Mjroots (
talk)
Ref 46 Aeroclub du Boulonnais no longer finds the relevant page and is redirected to the home page.
Fixed - fortunately ref 47 gave the date too.
Mjroots (
talk)
Location
Are there any details of its area available?
Not exactly sure what you mean here. The airfield's location between the two villages is given, and its location in relation to the nearest major town in given. Coordinates already appear in the infobox, but could be added here if desired.
Mjroots (
talk)
06:18, 5 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Well, the lede does say that it's a GA airfield, and the runway length is given in the infobox. I've not seen any source that gives the total area of the airfield.
Mjroots (
talk)
08:55, 5 April 2012 (UTC)reply
If it is not available, that is fine.
First World War
"flying the Handley Page O/400" sounds like there was only one of them. Suggest "flying Handley Page O/400 aircraft" or somesuch.
I am not objecting to chronological order. The issue is whether the text reads well. Since you have mentioned it, I note that the Lympne GA review picked up on the same issue, suggesting that a good copyedit was required. Some conjunctions, introductory phrases and linking text would help the flow considerably.
Several mentions of "it was notified". Is this a formal process connected with airfields? If so, it needs a little explanation on first occurence.
The phrase "it was notified" means that an
Notice to Airmen had been issued. A formal process of the relevant Civil Aviation Authority (DGAC or CAA as appropriate in this case). The term is already wikilinked earlier in the paragraph. Would a second wikilink be of benifit here?
Mjroots (
talk)
06:28, 5 April 2012 (UTC)reply
I don't think a second wikilink is necessary. It is not clear that "it was notified" implies that a Notice to Airmen was issued. Your text above is what is required. Somethink to link "it was notified" and "notice to airmen" and "Civil Aviation Authority" together, so that readers carry on reading, rather than clicking to find out what it means. Having read the article, the reader should be able to understand what "it was notified" means. For the details of how it works, they can follow the link. (again, same issue was raised for Lympne GAR).
Final para is all "On [date] ..." It needs variety, and maybe an intro: "The airfield was used by several notable people ..." to link the bits together.
That para covers events in 1935 and 1936. I though that it was better to combine the two years rather than have two very short paras for each year.
Mjroots (
talk)
06:57, 5 April 2012 (UTC)reply
Bigger para is good. So then, "Several notable people visited the airfield in 1935 and 1936, including ..." might work. Again, it is the flow of the text, not its structure that needs tweaking.
Is the new hanger still planned or has it been built? (Or don't we know?)
We don't know. The Google Earth images covering Saint-Inglevert are dated 2002 and there is some cloud cover obscuring the area where the hangars are. Nothing on Flickr either - wish there was a Geograph France! We can assume that it was built, but without evidence to support it saying it definitely was built is
WP:OR.
Mjroots (
talk)
07:28, 7 April 2012 (UTC)reply