This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
I've reverted the change of display of altitudes from ft/m to m/ft. Whilst MOS says that there should be consistency in the use of one form over the other, I believe that an occasional exception can be made here.
Being a French subject, the article naturally uses metric first, converted to imperial. I have no problem with that, but (and it's a big but) in most international aviation worldwide , altitudes are expressed in feet. This is the case for aircraft flying in France, so it is natural that theses measurements are expressed in imperial units, and converted to metric.
Mjroots (
talk) 05:06, 4 April 2012 (UTC)reply
OK, fair enough. I thought it was a case of having a source in imperial, but then being a French article, the units are flipped so metric is first. –
Fredddie™ 15:15, 4 April 2012 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a
list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article is within the scope of the
Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of
open tasks and
task forces. To use this banner, please see the
full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles
I've reverted the change of display of altitudes from ft/m to m/ft. Whilst MOS says that there should be consistency in the use of one form over the other, I believe that an occasional exception can be made here.
Being a French subject, the article naturally uses metric first, converted to imperial. I have no problem with that, but (and it's a big but) in most international aviation worldwide , altitudes are expressed in feet. This is the case for aircraft flying in France, so it is natural that theses measurements are expressed in imperial units, and converted to metric.
Mjroots (
talk) 05:06, 4 April 2012 (UTC)reply
OK, fair enough. I thought it was a case of having a source in imperial, but then being a French article, the units are flipped so metric is first. –
Fredddie™ 15:15, 4 April 2012 (UTC)reply