Fails to meet
WP:MOS-AM; Story -> Plot and is incomplete, Adaptations -> Media, English Adaptations is inappropriate separate section that should be covered in individual media sections, Music should be part of a production section. Does it comply with
WP:LEAD as it is not summarizing the article. References are badly formatted and article as a whole needs a clean up. Prose is not high quality and needs serious copy editing.
Massive amounts of unsourced content, and there are several dead links among the references that are in article. Character section contains analysis and assumptions of character motivations without sourcing, which generally makes them
WP:OR.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Completely lacking an actual plot section and has no production information at all. Character section too long and detailed for an article this size. Recommend following talk page "To Do" and get to making that character list and leaving a shorter summary in the main article. Music section excessively focused on changes in lyrics from Japanese to English version and inappropriate quotes lyrics without third-party sourcing discussing the differences.
Reception section is overly focused on anime with almost nothing about manga. Break out of English adaptations into a
Sailor Moon (English adaptations) reflects a non-neutral treatment of the topic and an inappropriate POV split.
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
Music snippets are not in compliance with
WP:NONFREE; Primarily supported by OR use of primarily material, not significant coverage by third-party sources. Infobox image is not an appropriate image for the topic and should be using the manga cover found further in the article per the AM MoS and project consensus regarding infobox images. Infobox image is also badly sourced and does not accurately support the claim that it is a promotional image. If can be properly source and the FUR better explained, recommend moving to suggested character list split. --
AnmaFinotera (
talk·contribs)
03:44, 19 July 2009 (UTC)reply
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I have delisted this article from
good article status for completely failing to meet the Good Article criteria, as detailed above. From the To Do list on the talk page, it seems likely active editors were already aware it needs much work, and I hope to see this back at Good Article status after its been cleaned up and reimproved. Would recommend a Peer Review before any future GAN to ensure all major issues have been adequately corrected. --
AnmaFinotera (
talk·contribs)
03:44, 19 July 2009 (UTC)reply
Fails to meet
WP:MOS-AM; Story -> Plot and is incomplete, Adaptations -> Media, English Adaptations is inappropriate separate section that should be covered in individual media sections, Music should be part of a production section. Does it comply with
WP:LEAD as it is not summarizing the article. References are badly formatted and article as a whole needs a clean up. Prose is not high quality and needs serious copy editing.
Massive amounts of unsourced content, and there are several dead links among the references that are in article. Character section contains analysis and assumptions of character motivations without sourcing, which generally makes them
WP:OR.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Completely lacking an actual plot section and has no production information at all. Character section too long and detailed for an article this size. Recommend following talk page "To Do" and get to making that character list and leaving a shorter summary in the main article. Music section excessively focused on changes in lyrics from Japanese to English version and inappropriate quotes lyrics without third-party sourcing discussing the differences.
Reception section is overly focused on anime with almost nothing about manga. Break out of English adaptations into a
Sailor Moon (English adaptations) reflects a non-neutral treatment of the topic and an inappropriate POV split.
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
Music snippets are not in compliance with
WP:NONFREE; Primarily supported by OR use of primarily material, not significant coverage by third-party sources. Infobox image is not an appropriate image for the topic and should be using the manga cover found further in the article per the AM MoS and project consensus regarding infobox images. Infobox image is also badly sourced and does not accurately support the claim that it is a promotional image. If can be properly source and the FUR better explained, recommend moving to suggested character list split. --
AnmaFinotera (
talk·contribs)
03:44, 19 July 2009 (UTC)reply
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
I have delisted this article from
good article status for completely failing to meet the Good Article criteria, as detailed above. From the To Do list on the talk page, it seems likely active editors were already aware it needs much work, and I hope to see this back at Good Article status after its been cleaned up and reimproved. Would recommend a Peer Review before any future GAN to ensure all major issues have been adequately corrected. --
AnmaFinotera (
talk·contribs)
03:44, 19 July 2009 (UTC)reply