![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 10 March 2019. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I believe Mr. Chakrabarti is a notable person. Therefore I am adding "R with possibilities" to the redirect.
I offer as evidence of his notability that he is on Politico’s “Power List” of people to watch in 2019. [1]
References
Should this page develop in to an article, I also note that there are now many print and web publications that mention or discuss Mr. Chakrabarti's accomplishments.
Phersh ( talk) 22:49, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
re: the "Campaign finance controversy" section:
czar 18:40, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Note that the actual "merge" discussion is taking place at the AOC article's talk page, and that is the discussion that will be evaluated for whether the article is merged or not. -- MelanieN ( talk) 16:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Very weird that that people have fought successfully (so far) to keep Saikat's Wiki free and clear from this direct complaint siting his name: https://www.scribd.com/document/401081150/AOC-FEC-Complaint-as-Filed
It was Saikat's actions that led to the above complaint being filed. This is a material thing that should somehow be reflected on this page, but it seems that he (and/or some of his associates) are maneuvering successfully here on Wikipedia to keep it off. It also should be cited that Saikat left his highlighted position with AOC during these investigations by the FEC (that is extremely important and material, as it is one possible explanation for his departure, which has not been ruled out). Without the above complaint (citing Saikat's name in particular, and several of his actions) I take it that Wikipedia in general is a biased source and would advise my ultra-high net worth individual clients to stop donations (and request refunds of donations) to the Wikimedia foundation immediately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:86:102:785B:8CF9:F5CE:9840:1715 ( talk) 14:45, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez#Proposed merge with Saikat Chakrabarti
czar 10:08, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Rolling Stone 2018 [1] is a source about his work on Sanders campaign, his cofounding of Brand New Congress (with Alexandra Rojas and Corbin Trent), and his work with Justice Democrats, a group that did lots of stuff aside from helping AOC. HouseOfChange ( talk) 00:12, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
References
The three leaders of Justice Democrats — Chakrabarti, Alexandra Rojas and Corbin Trent — met back in 2015, when the only thing they had in common was the fact that they each dropped everything they were doing and went to work for Sanders not long after he declared his candidacy. "I wasn't entirely sure he had all the right solutions but I knew he was talking about the right problems," Chakrabarti tells Rolling Stone.
Inquisitr is primarily an aggregator of news. According to our Reliable Sources noticeboard, it is considered unreliable for two reasons. 1) WP articles should not cite an aggregator but rather find and cite the original article. and 2) Some of what they publish may be by "unvetted" contributors and not fact-checked. The January 2017 Inquisitr article is by a regular contributor Scott Hough and reports on an interview of Cenk Uygur with Saikat Chakrabarti, which is also available on YouTube. I think it is a reliable report on the interview, but what do others think? 20:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
I
removed Legal and campaign finance experts have agreed with Mitrani's assessment.
[1]
[2]
[3]
because none of the sources cited (nor any others that I've seen) support the statement. The sources do not include any campaign finance experts agreeing with Mitrani (or commenting on Mitrani's assessment in any way). There are other issues (whether they are RS, whether this is DUE), but not-supported-by-sources is the biggest one.
Leviv
ich 23:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
References
He left because of this: https://www.theweek.in/news/world/2019/07/13/subhas-chandra-bose-t-shirt-lands-aide-democrat-nazi-soup.html
Why doesn't this mention the fact? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.47.153.134 ( talk) 02:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 10 March 2019. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I believe Mr. Chakrabarti is a notable person. Therefore I am adding "R with possibilities" to the redirect.
I offer as evidence of his notability that he is on Politico’s “Power List” of people to watch in 2019. [1]
References
Should this page develop in to an article, I also note that there are now many print and web publications that mention or discuss Mr. Chakrabarti's accomplishments.
Phersh ( talk) 22:49, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
re: the "Campaign finance controversy" section:
czar 18:40, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Note that the actual "merge" discussion is taking place at the AOC article's talk page, and that is the discussion that will be evaluated for whether the article is merged or not. -- MelanieN ( talk) 16:50, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Very weird that that people have fought successfully (so far) to keep Saikat's Wiki free and clear from this direct complaint siting his name: https://www.scribd.com/document/401081150/AOC-FEC-Complaint-as-Filed
It was Saikat's actions that led to the above complaint being filed. This is a material thing that should somehow be reflected on this page, but it seems that he (and/or some of his associates) are maneuvering successfully here on Wikipedia to keep it off. It also should be cited that Saikat left his highlighted position with AOC during these investigations by the FEC (that is extremely important and material, as it is one possible explanation for his departure, which has not been ruled out). Without the above complaint (citing Saikat's name in particular, and several of his actions) I take it that Wikipedia in general is a biased source and would advise my ultra-high net worth individual clients to stop donations (and request refunds of donations) to the Wikimedia foundation immediately. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:86:102:785B:8CF9:F5CE:9840:1715 ( talk) 14:45, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
Talk:Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez#Proposed merge with Saikat Chakrabarti
czar 10:08, 11 March 2019 (UTC)
Rolling Stone 2018 [1] is a source about his work on Sanders campaign, his cofounding of Brand New Congress (with Alexandra Rojas and Corbin Trent), and his work with Justice Democrats, a group that did lots of stuff aside from helping AOC. HouseOfChange ( talk) 00:12, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
References
The three leaders of Justice Democrats — Chakrabarti, Alexandra Rojas and Corbin Trent — met back in 2015, when the only thing they had in common was the fact that they each dropped everything they were doing and went to work for Sanders not long after he declared his candidacy. "I wasn't entirely sure he had all the right solutions but I knew he was talking about the right problems," Chakrabarti tells Rolling Stone.
Inquisitr is primarily an aggregator of news. According to our Reliable Sources noticeboard, it is considered unreliable for two reasons. 1) WP articles should not cite an aggregator but rather find and cite the original article. and 2) Some of what they publish may be by "unvetted" contributors and not fact-checked. The January 2017 Inquisitr article is by a regular contributor Scott Hough and reports on an interview of Cenk Uygur with Saikat Chakrabarti, which is also available on YouTube. I think it is a reliable report on the interview, but what do others think? 20:16, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
I
removed Legal and campaign finance experts have agreed with Mitrani's assessment.
[1]
[2]
[3]
because none of the sources cited (nor any others that I've seen) support the statement. The sources do not include any campaign finance experts agreeing with Mitrani (or commenting on Mitrani's assessment in any way). There are other issues (whether they are RS, whether this is DUE), but not-supported-by-sources is the biggest one.
Leviv
ich 23:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
References
He left because of this: https://www.theweek.in/news/world/2019/07/13/subhas-chandra-bose-t-shirt-lands-aide-democrat-nazi-soup.html
Why doesn't this mention the fact? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.47.153.134 ( talk) 02:14, 19 January 2021 (UTC)