This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Saffron (color). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 19:09, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
What do other editors think on the applicability of WP:STRONGNAT, which states, "An article on a topic that has strong ties to a particular English-speaking nation should use the English of that nation" to this article? Should the article use Indian English spelling? AusLondonder ( talk) 05:37, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: No move. This argument came down to differing interpretations of elements of WP:ENGVAR and the related WP:TITLEVAR policy, about which there was no solid agreement. Several supporters made good points about strong national ties to India per WP:TIES, but a majority of participants did not find this persuasive (even one of the supporters found it weak). On the other hand, several opposers brought up WP:RETAIN and these arguments were not convincingly countered other than the TIES argument. As a result, I find the consensus to be against the move. Cúchullain t/ c 18:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Saffron (color) →
Saffron (colour) –
WP:TIES –
AusLondonder (
talk) 08:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Saffron (color). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:45, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
@ EvergreenFir: I don't know if you're just not done modifying the Religion section, but right now there's just the statement 'Sikhs regard saffron as a "militant color"', which doesn't line up well with the image caption on the side that says the Nishan Sahib is the "Flag of the Sikh religion" (which is also what the Nishan Sahib article states). And could you possibly include a quote from that source about it being a militant color? -- Fyrael ( talk) 21:01, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. The majority of editors participating in the discussion do not consider the ties strong enough to override the presumption in favor of not changing the spelling style of the article. ( non-admin closure) ( t · c) buidhe 18:07, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Saffron (color) → Saffron (colour) – Strong ties to India and was originally the other way around (as can be seen from the article text); it was changed in error. Getsnoopy ( talk) 06:12, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
The Religion and Political uses section seem promising destinations for the merge - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 03:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
This
level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Saffron (color). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 19:09, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
What do other editors think on the applicability of WP:STRONGNAT, which states, "An article on a topic that has strong ties to a particular English-speaking nation should use the English of that nation" to this article? Should the article use Indian English spelling? AusLondonder ( talk) 05:37, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: No move. This argument came down to differing interpretations of elements of WP:ENGVAR and the related WP:TITLEVAR policy, about which there was no solid agreement. Several supporters made good points about strong national ties to India per WP:TIES, but a majority of participants did not find this persuasive (even one of the supporters found it weak). On the other hand, several opposers brought up WP:RETAIN and these arguments were not convincingly countered other than the TIES argument. As a result, I find the consensus to be against the move. Cúchullain t/ c 18:13, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Saffron (color) →
Saffron (colour) –
WP:TIES –
AusLondonder (
talk) 08:40, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Saffron (color). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 02:45, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
@ EvergreenFir: I don't know if you're just not done modifying the Religion section, but right now there's just the statement 'Sikhs regard saffron as a "militant color"', which doesn't line up well with the image caption on the side that says the Nishan Sahib is the "Flag of the Sikh religion" (which is also what the Nishan Sahib article states). And could you possibly include a quote from that source about it being a militant color? -- Fyrael ( talk) 21:01, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. The majority of editors participating in the discussion do not consider the ties strong enough to override the presumption in favor of not changing the spelling style of the article. ( non-admin closure) ( t · c) buidhe 18:07, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
Saffron (color) → Saffron (colour) – Strong ties to India and was originally the other way around (as can be seen from the article text); it was changed in error. Getsnoopy ( talk) 06:12, 22 April 2021 (UTC)
The Religion and Political uses section seem promising destinations for the merge - MPGuy2824 ( talk) 03:20, 27 August 2022 (UTC)