This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Included in the external links section of this article are links to Instagram and Twitter. This is contrary to
WP:ELNO#EL10 which says that links to
Social networking sites (such as
Myspace,
Facebook,
LinkedIn, and
Instagram), chat or
discussion forums/groups (such as
Yahoo! Groups),
Twitter feeds,
Usenet newsgroups or e-mail lists
should normally be avoided. This seems fairly clear so I removed these links citing WP:ELNO#EL10, but they were restored by
Erpert, who cited
WP:ELOFFICIAL. However,
WP:ELMINOFFICIAL, which immediately follows WP:ELOFFICIAL in the MOS, says Normally, only one official link is included.
It further says more than one link may be appropriate, under a very few limited circumstances ... More than one official link should be provided only when the additional links provide the reader with significant unique content and are not prominently linked from other official websites. For example, if the main page of the official website for an author contains a link to the author's blog and Twitter feed, then it is not appropriate to provide links to all three
. This almost seems to have been specifically written for this article since the subject's blog and Twitter feed are both linked from the official website. The Instagram page is not listed, but the Instagram page does not provide the reader with significant unique content
. Therefore, the Instagram and Twitter feeds should not be linked in the article. --
AussieLegend (
✉)
08:56, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() | The external links guideline recommends avoiding links to Facebook unless the profile is an official account, "controlled by the subject (organization or individual person) of the Wikipedia article" and when the links to Facebook "provide the reader with unique content and are not prominently linked from other official websites". Wikipedia is not a directory for helping Facebook users find pages on Facebook. |
![]() | The external links guideline recommends avoiding links to Twitter. Only include links to social media if it is not easily linked from another link included in the article (i.e. if the individual's homepage is linked and that has a prominent link to a Twitter feed, delete the Twitter link here) and when the Twitter link provides the reader with significant unique content. Wikipedia is not a comprehensive directory of a subject's web presence. Only link to official accounts "controlled by the subject (organization or individual person) of the Wikipedia article". Legitimate Twitter accounts are usually named in reliable sources or linked by other subject-controlled sources; or marked "Verified" by Twitter. |
Normally, only one official link is included ... For example, if the main page of the official website for an author contains a link to the author's blog and Twitter feed, then it is not appropriate to provide links to all three
Erpert – I'm just wondering what your personal take is on Sadie Calvano and whether/how she clears WP:NACTOR? She clearly has one "significant role" to date ( Mom). But I'm not really seeing multiple "significant" roles here. From my perspective, I think this one's a borderline case – I wouldn't take it to WP:AfD myself, but if I had created this article myself I think I would have done so in Draft space first. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 19:42, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Followup: Unlike other TV actors I've edited, Calvano has gotten enough "independent coverage" (e.g. one-on-one interviews in places like Teen Vogue and Backstage) that I now believe she (narrowly) clears notability. But this may be the "Stubbiest" article for a "notable" subject that I've ever seen, and seems to be really hard to flesh out the text much further... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 22:48, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
AussieLegend, would you please provide proof that filmography sections of IMDb are user-generated? (It's obvious that trivia sections, forums and reviews are, but...) Erpert blah, blah, blah... 05:11, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 19:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Included in the external links section of this article are links to Instagram and Twitter. This is contrary to
WP:ELNO#EL10 which says that links to
Social networking sites (such as
Myspace,
Facebook,
LinkedIn, and
Instagram), chat or
discussion forums/groups (such as
Yahoo! Groups),
Twitter feeds,
Usenet newsgroups or e-mail lists
should normally be avoided. This seems fairly clear so I removed these links citing WP:ELNO#EL10, but they were restored by
Erpert, who cited
WP:ELOFFICIAL. However,
WP:ELMINOFFICIAL, which immediately follows WP:ELOFFICIAL in the MOS, says Normally, only one official link is included.
It further says more than one link may be appropriate, under a very few limited circumstances ... More than one official link should be provided only when the additional links provide the reader with significant unique content and are not prominently linked from other official websites. For example, if the main page of the official website for an author contains a link to the author's blog and Twitter feed, then it is not appropriate to provide links to all three
. This almost seems to have been specifically written for this article since the subject's blog and Twitter feed are both linked from the official website. The Instagram page is not listed, but the Instagram page does not provide the reader with significant unique content
. Therefore, the Instagram and Twitter feeds should not be linked in the article. --
AussieLegend (
✉)
08:56, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
![]() | The external links guideline recommends avoiding links to Facebook unless the profile is an official account, "controlled by the subject (organization or individual person) of the Wikipedia article" and when the links to Facebook "provide the reader with unique content and are not prominently linked from other official websites". Wikipedia is not a directory for helping Facebook users find pages on Facebook. |
![]() | The external links guideline recommends avoiding links to Twitter. Only include links to social media if it is not easily linked from another link included in the article (i.e. if the individual's homepage is linked and that has a prominent link to a Twitter feed, delete the Twitter link here) and when the Twitter link provides the reader with significant unique content. Wikipedia is not a comprehensive directory of a subject's web presence. Only link to official accounts "controlled by the subject (organization or individual person) of the Wikipedia article". Legitimate Twitter accounts are usually named in reliable sources or linked by other subject-controlled sources; or marked "Verified" by Twitter. |
Normally, only one official link is included ... For example, if the main page of the official website for an author contains a link to the author's blog and Twitter feed, then it is not appropriate to provide links to all three
Erpert – I'm just wondering what your personal take is on Sadie Calvano and whether/how she clears WP:NACTOR? She clearly has one "significant role" to date ( Mom). But I'm not really seeing multiple "significant" roles here. From my perspective, I think this one's a borderline case – I wouldn't take it to WP:AfD myself, but if I had created this article myself I think I would have done so in Draft space first. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 19:42, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Followup: Unlike other TV actors I've edited, Calvano has gotten enough "independent coverage" (e.g. one-on-one interviews in places like Teen Vogue and Backstage) that I now believe she (narrowly) clears notability. But this may be the "Stubbiest" article for a "notable" subject that I've ever seen, and seems to be really hard to flesh out the text much further... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 22:48, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
AussieLegend, would you please provide proof that filmography sections of IMDb are user-generated? (It's obvious that trivia sections, forums and reviews are, but...) Erpert blah, blah, blah... 05:11, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 19:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)