This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sacred Relics (Topkapı Palace) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not all Muslims believe this, so the article should say which do and do not. Superm401 - Talk 20:44, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Some of the items in Istanbul are apparently:
according to the book "Sacred Trusts". Gryffindor 23:37, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Letters are highly unlikely as that person Mohammed - so far - has been proven to have been illiterate. No writing, no letters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:45:4904:DF83:7DB2:1550:3DE3:49A8 ( talk) 23:54, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sacred Relics (Topkapı Palace). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:34, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
There should be some discussion of authenticity of the relics. This is normal for all relics in every religion. Fig ( talk) 20:26, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sacred Relics (Topkapı Palace) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not all Muslims believe this, so the article should say which do and do not. Superm401 - Talk 20:44, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Some of the items in Istanbul are apparently:
according to the book "Sacred Trusts". Gryffindor 23:37, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
Letters are highly unlikely as that person Mohammed - so far - has been proven to have been illiterate. No writing, no letters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:45:4904:DF83:7DB2:1550:3DE3:49A8 ( talk) 23:54, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sacred Relics (Topkapı Palace). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:34, 7 December 2017 (UTC)
There should be some discussion of authenticity of the relics. This is normal for all relics in every religion. Fig ( talk) 20:26, 16 September 2018 (UTC)