This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sacred Grove (Latter Day Saints) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
An image used in this article, File:Trees in the Sacred Grove.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 13:31, 24 November 2011 (UTC) |
While discussing the First Vision, this article calls it a "an important theophany" "where two personages, identified as God the Father and Jesus Christ" appeared to Joseph Smith.
However, on the First Vision page ( /info/en/?search=First_Vision) it states that the personages were "implied to be Jesus and God the Father." (emphasis added) The explicit wording of several accounts are later given with the conclusion "Although Smith left their identity inexplicit, most Latter Day Saints infer that these personages were God the Father and Jesus." One alternative possibility for the identity of the personages, for instance, is Mormon and Moroni, characters in the Book of Mormon.
Perhaps the wording here should be changed to indicate that most Latter Day Saints believe it was a theophany, although no original sources identify the beings in the vision. ( Karzab1 ( talk) 21:18, 13 September 2013 (UTC))
This article needs to be moved back to its original title and then a discussion should be held about moving the page to a new title. There is already an article titled Sacred grove that deals with the general nature of them, so having Sacred Grove as a separate article also using it in the general sense is duplication. The move will need to be done by an admin since "Sacred Grove" now has a separate edit history. In any case, page moves like that should be discussed. Even if there are other "Sacred Grove" sites (as a proper noun like the LDS one), we still have the issue of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. -- JonRidinger ( talk) 02:08, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was no consensus. -- BDD ( talk) 23:39, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Sacred Grove (Latter Day Saint movement) → Sacred Grove – Page was moved without any discussion and replaced with a stub using "Sacred Grove" in a general sense, preventing a move without administrative assistance. An article already exists for the general use of the term called Sacred grove. Relisted. BDD ( talk) 23:13, 22 October 2013 (UTC) JonRidinger ( talk) 02:15, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Raised by above I had a look at was in the category and have to say there are several worse examples than Sacred Grove (which at least is a capital C). Per WP:BRD I WP:MOVEd six article titles which are all generic small case titles:
I can't believe anyone will contest those 2, but if they do a simple Tech Request can move the dab out of the way.
Then these 4, no dab made as I suspect someone might contest:
Anyone who objects is very welcome to do so and immediately revert (if you need help to do so ping me). Hence listing here where they will be seen. In ictu oculi ( talk) 07:10, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Sacred Grove (Latter Day Saints). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sacred Grove (Latter Day Saints). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Sacred Grove (Latter Day Saints) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
An image used in this article, File:Trees in the Sacred Grove.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 13:31, 24 November 2011 (UTC) |
While discussing the First Vision, this article calls it a "an important theophany" "where two personages, identified as God the Father and Jesus Christ" appeared to Joseph Smith.
However, on the First Vision page ( /info/en/?search=First_Vision) it states that the personages were "implied to be Jesus and God the Father." (emphasis added) The explicit wording of several accounts are later given with the conclusion "Although Smith left their identity inexplicit, most Latter Day Saints infer that these personages were God the Father and Jesus." One alternative possibility for the identity of the personages, for instance, is Mormon and Moroni, characters in the Book of Mormon.
Perhaps the wording here should be changed to indicate that most Latter Day Saints believe it was a theophany, although no original sources identify the beings in the vision. ( Karzab1 ( talk) 21:18, 13 September 2013 (UTC))
This article needs to be moved back to its original title and then a discussion should be held about moving the page to a new title. There is already an article titled Sacred grove that deals with the general nature of them, so having Sacred Grove as a separate article also using it in the general sense is duplication. The move will need to be done by an admin since "Sacred Grove" now has a separate edit history. In any case, page moves like that should be discussed. Even if there are other "Sacred Grove" sites (as a proper noun like the LDS one), we still have the issue of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. -- JonRidinger ( talk) 02:08, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
The result of the proposal was no consensus. -- BDD ( talk) 23:39, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
Sacred Grove (Latter Day Saint movement) → Sacred Grove – Page was moved without any discussion and replaced with a stub using "Sacred Grove" in a general sense, preventing a move without administrative assistance. An article already exists for the general use of the term called Sacred grove. Relisted. BDD ( talk) 23:13, 22 October 2013 (UTC) JonRidinger ( talk) 02:15, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Raised by above I had a look at was in the category and have to say there are several worse examples than Sacred Grove (which at least is a capital C). Per WP:BRD I WP:MOVEd six article titles which are all generic small case titles:
I can't believe anyone will contest those 2, but if they do a simple Tech Request can move the dab out of the way.
Then these 4, no dab made as I suspect someone might contest:
Anyone who objects is very welcome to do so and immediately revert (if you need help to do so ping me). Hence listing here where they will be seen. In ictu oculi ( talk) 07:10, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Sacred Grove (Latter Day Saints). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 13:39, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Sacred Grove (Latter Day Saints). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 17:11, 31 December 2016 (UTC)