This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Aviation: Aircraft This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met This article is supported by the aircraft project. Military history: Aviation / European / Nordic / World War II / Cold War Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military aviation task force European military history task force Nordic military history task force World War II task force Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989) Sweden Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The link to ASJA in the introduction does not seem to lead to the correct information.

There seems to be some confusion in the operators section. Was it Austria or Australia that operated the Saab 17? Now it lists Australia as an operator, but the Austrian Air Force as the arm that operated it. Uhu219 11:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC) reply

Appears to be corrected by now. Austria operated a single aircraft for a brief time as a target tug. Per80 ( talk) 00:27, 8 August 2013 (UTC) reply

What´s the difference between Numbers built and Total production run? I suspect they mean the same thing, but they give different numbers. 1 September 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.231.58.98 ( talk) 00:29, 1 September 2007 (UTC) reply

The quantity mentioned in Numbers built seem to indicate the number of planes used by the Swedish Air Force according to Bo Widfeldt/Åke Hall (1999) Svenska Vingar 1: Svenska militära flygplan och helikoptrar 1911-1999. Nässjö, Air Historic Research ISBN  91-971605-3-9, whereas the total production run is probably including export and prototypes. -- Pelle-Gnillot ( talk) 19:42, 20 December 2008 (UTC) reply

Linking national origin is more properly a discussion for WT:AIR - from a quick survey of various pages, I cannot find any consistency, nor any discussion on the matter in the archives. Some pages are linked, others are not.

As for the name, wiki standards state that all caps is only to be used if the letters are read individually, regardless of the company's usage. That said, Saab AB is incorrect for the time period, as the AB in Saab means the same as the AB added afterwards - so it should be simply Saab. Spelling out the full name isn't all that useful either since there were several unrelated Swedish companies that used the same or very similar names, while Saab is distinct and recognizable. - NiD.29 ( talk) 20:18, 29 December 2020 (UTC) reply