This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Internet Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Does anyone know who runs this? I clicked on a link (i knew it was spam i was just curious) and i got the message, "Unable to complete forwarding for xxxxx.com. Destination is listed as spam:- Blocked, xxxxx.com on lists [ob], See: http://www.surbl.org/lists.html." Its got to be a pretty powerful organization if they're filtering what i can and can't see on the internet.

They don't control what you can see or can't see on the Internet. Your or someone else's mail provider is likely using the list to filter out spam.

Also, this article is not well-written, and does not provide a great deal of information on what an SURBL is. It's more just an argument between two people than anything else. Plitero ( talk) 13:49, 24 November 2009 (UTC) reply

I agree completely, the article is not up to Wikipedia's usual standards. I'm going to {{cleanup}} the page for now and if nobody has altered it I'll pop back to do the job when I've time later. Sardaukar86 ( talk) 00:41, 10 May 2010 (UTC) reply