![]() | SSK 90 helmet has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 11, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from SSK 90 helmet appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 5 February 2018 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
"served as a "grab-roll" "
Is that the thing on top? It says "near the front".
And is the image the back of the helmet? If so, it should say that.
Maury Markowitz ( talk) 17:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Hog Farm ( talk · contribs) 03:51, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
This one looks to be in pretty good shape.
Open question - is it worth using the convert template on 1 millimeter? I'm leaning towards that choosing not to use the conversion was the correct choice here, as the conversion of one millimeter to inches is gonna result in a rather meaningless decimal value.
{{convert|1|mm|abbr=off}}gives us
1 millimetre (0.039 inches), which seems pretty meaningless.
I guess Germanhelmets.com is probably okay for GA, as the author has been published by Osprey, although Osprey has been known to publish some lower-grade stuff on occassion.
I'm not familiar with Talbot's Fine Accessories as a source, what are the author's credentials?
Any of the sources specify why the helmet was unsuitable? Obviously, if RS don't mention this, it can't be included, but if there is information about that out there, it should be included.
Not much included in the article, which is fine, because there doesn't seem to be much that can be said about the subject. Placing on hold. Hog Farm Talk 06:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
![]() | SSK 90 helmet has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: March 11, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from SSK 90 helmet appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 5 February 2018 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
"served as a "grab-roll" "
Is that the thing on top? It says "near the front".
And is the image the back of the helmet? If so, it should say that.
Maury Markowitz ( talk) 17:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Hog Farm ( talk · contribs) 03:51, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
This one looks to be in pretty good shape.
Open question - is it worth using the convert template on 1 millimeter? I'm leaning towards that choosing not to use the conversion was the correct choice here, as the conversion of one millimeter to inches is gonna result in a rather meaningless decimal value.
{{convert|1|mm|abbr=off}}gives us
1 millimetre (0.039 inches), which seems pretty meaningless.
I guess Germanhelmets.com is probably okay for GA, as the author has been published by Osprey, although Osprey has been known to publish some lower-grade stuff on occassion.
I'm not familiar with Talbot's Fine Accessories as a source, what are the author's credentials?
Any of the sources specify why the helmet was unsuitable? Obviously, if RS don't mention this, it can't be included, but if there is information about that out there, it should be included.
Not much included in the article, which is fine, because there doesn't seem to be much that can be said about the subject. Placing on hold. Hog Farm Talk 06:00, 11 March 2021 (UTC)