This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A news item involving SN 2014J was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 27 January 2014. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The caption for the animation refers to "the first image" and "the second image". That's not much help, since the animation is looped. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.145.142 ( talk) 23:36, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
I didn't delete this because I'm not a jerk, but:
Huh? Lack of citation aside, I don't know if it's the grammar, but I don't know what this is even trying to say. The "large extinction to?" ???????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:468:C80:4392:5479:ED:E059:A12C ( talk) 17:02, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
This talks about no x-rays detected. This should be in the article. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 06:34, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
A news item involving SN 2014J was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 27 January 2014. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
The caption for the animation refers to "the first image" and "the second image". That's not much help, since the animation is looped. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.145.142 ( talk) 23:36, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
I didn't delete this because I'm not a jerk, but:
Huh? Lack of citation aside, I don't know if it's the grammar, but I don't know what this is even trying to say. The "large extinction to?" ???????? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:468:C80:4392:5479:ED:E059:A12C ( talk) 17:02, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
This talks about no x-rays detected. This should be in the article. Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 06:34, 16 August 2014 (UTC)