Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the
Wikipedia:good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process. On a personal note, I realised as I read through this that I had mentioned this action before in an FA I wrote two years ago,
Ronald Niel Stuart, who was on Farnborough later, so it was interesting to revisit the material.
Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.-- Jackyd101 ( talk) 23:52, 18 December 2008 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the
Wikipedia:good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process. On a personal note, I realised as I read through this that I had mentioned this action before in an FA I wrote two years ago,
Ronald Niel Stuart, who was on Farnborough later, so it was interesting to revisit the material.
Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.-- Jackyd101 ( talk) 23:52, 18 December 2008 (UTC)