This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Finance and
Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
I am a former employee, but am not connected with the firm any longer and can confirm that the redirect was a necessary one which reflected the development of the organisation. I have reviewed the language used and removed the COI Tag.
qhb (
talk)
22:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Advertising Language
I have revised the language proposed by
User:Sixmedienstelle and made it factual, added references and links. I would like to remove the advertising Tag now. Please can I have a view on that? Thanks
qhb (
talk)
22:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)reply
It was an improvement, but I generally view language that expresses aspirations on the behalf of the organization ("provide", "aim") as still promotional. The references are still quite thin on independent, in-depth coverage. I argue that the {{advert}} tag should remain.
— jmcgnh(talk)(contribs)17:04, 22 January 2018 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Switzerland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Switzerland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwitzerlandWikipedia:WikiProject SwitzerlandTemplate:WikiProject SwitzerlandSwitzerland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to
Finance and
Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include
conflict of interest,
autobiography, and
neutral point of view.
I am a former employee, but am not connected with the firm any longer and can confirm that the redirect was a necessary one which reflected the development of the organisation. I have reviewed the language used and removed the COI Tag.
qhb (
talk)
22:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)reply
Advertising Language
I have revised the language proposed by
User:Sixmedienstelle and made it factual, added references and links. I would like to remove the advertising Tag now. Please can I have a view on that? Thanks
qhb (
talk)
22:03, 20 July 2016 (UTC)reply
It was an improvement, but I generally view language that expresses aspirations on the behalf of the organization ("provide", "aim") as still promotional. The references are still quite thin on independent, in-depth coverage. I argue that the {{advert}} tag should remain.
— jmcgnh(talk)(contribs)17:04, 22 January 2018 (UTC)reply