![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 September 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to List of SGI products. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
SGI has been involved from the beginning of the graphic workstation industry in the creation of such system. It nearly invented the concept, and has been a major player of the field until the turn of the mullenium. For the past ten years or so, while still presetn on that market, it failed to keep up with the industry. With this new product line SGI changed its strategy and re introduced an offer to a market that distinguishes itself more by product end of life ( Hewlett Packard, IBM, Sun stopped their RISC workstation product line IBM exist the field altogether ). The availability of a new product line from the major player of the fiels from the past three decades is of importance to the graphic workstation market.
nearly all past graphic workstation systems by SGI has its wikipedia article, without any problem so far ( see octane, indigo, O2 ... etc ). Why would Virtu be any different ? Of course as stated this is a stub. It has to be completed, but what is writtent is a mere description of a product line, it is as neutral as can be, and should only be judge for what it is, a quick start for an article that has to be enriched. -- Dwarfpower ( talk) 13:40, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 25 September 2008 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to List of SGI products. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
SGI has been involved from the beginning of the graphic workstation industry in the creation of such system. It nearly invented the concept, and has been a major player of the field until the turn of the mullenium. For the past ten years or so, while still presetn on that market, it failed to keep up with the industry. With this new product line SGI changed its strategy and re introduced an offer to a market that distinguishes itself more by product end of life ( Hewlett Packard, IBM, Sun stopped their RISC workstation product line IBM exist the field altogether ). The availability of a new product line from the major player of the fiels from the past three decades is of importance to the graphic workstation market.
nearly all past graphic workstation systems by SGI has its wikipedia article, without any problem so far ( see octane, indigo, O2 ... etc ). Why would Virtu be any different ? Of course as stated this is a stub. It has to be completed, but what is writtent is a mere description of a product line, it is as neutral as can be, and should only be judge for what it is, a quick start for an article that has to be enriched. -- Dwarfpower ( talk) 13:40, 25 September 2008 (UTC)