Technical check. No dabs, no deadlinks. Images have
WP:alt text, but it does not describe the image for an unsighted or partially sighted reader. For example, the fly alt text names the insect, which repeats the caption, but does not describe it. Similarly with the other images, the logo etc need to be describedJimfbleak - talk to me?16:38, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
DoneI wasn't quite sure what ALT text was for. Fixed now.
Gene Harrington is a committee head for the National Pest Management Association. He keeps a list of states that have IPM requirements for schools that he e-mails out to a list of people in federal and state government that work in pesticide regulation. The list isn't available publicly - he sent it to my supervisor. How should I explain this - a footnote?
Most of first paragraph of "History" lacks a reference. This is important because it makes significant claims about state and SENSOR activities
I've explained that
in the peer review - basically, all of that information comes from the first source cited. Should I repeat the citation for subsequent sentences?
Last sentence of "Case definition" lacks a ref, not so critical, but shouldn't be difficult to find one
Done
Several articles have attracted media attention and motivated legislative or other governmental action. If that's the case, it should be easy to reference some
The subsequent paragraphs are meant to explain that. Should I cite sources for that sentence anyway?
Florida Medfly Eradication Program is capitalisation correct?
Yes.
Government Accountability Office references seem strangely formatted. I would have expected quotation marks for an article title or italics for a publication title somewhere?
Done
No serious problems with content or text. I made
these changes to fix typos, avoid repetition of words, or similar minor stylistic issues. Please check that you are happy with these
Heh. Good for the most part, except I think you're probably the fifth person that has changed
disinsection to disinfection, thinking it's a typo. "Disinsection" is a technical term referring specifically to the decontamination of aircraft for customs. I changed it back. :-)
Technical check. No dabs, no deadlinks. Images have
WP:alt text, but it does not describe the image for an unsighted or partially sighted reader. For example, the fly alt text names the insect, which repeats the caption, but does not describe it. Similarly with the other images, the logo etc need to be describedJimfbleak - talk to me?16:38, 1 December 2009 (UTC)reply
DoneI wasn't quite sure what ALT text was for. Fixed now.
Gene Harrington is a committee head for the National Pest Management Association. He keeps a list of states that have IPM requirements for schools that he e-mails out to a list of people in federal and state government that work in pesticide regulation. The list isn't available publicly - he sent it to my supervisor. How should I explain this - a footnote?
Most of first paragraph of "History" lacks a reference. This is important because it makes significant claims about state and SENSOR activities
I've explained that
in the peer review - basically, all of that information comes from the first source cited. Should I repeat the citation for subsequent sentences?
Last sentence of "Case definition" lacks a ref, not so critical, but shouldn't be difficult to find one
Done
Several articles have attracted media attention and motivated legislative or other governmental action. If that's the case, it should be easy to reference some
The subsequent paragraphs are meant to explain that. Should I cite sources for that sentence anyway?
Florida Medfly Eradication Program is capitalisation correct?
Yes.
Government Accountability Office references seem strangely formatted. I would have expected quotation marks for an article title or italics for a publication title somewhere?
Done
No serious problems with content or text. I made
these changes to fix typos, avoid repetition of words, or similar minor stylistic issues. Please check that you are happy with these
Heh. Good for the most part, except I think you're probably the fifth person that has changed
disinsection to disinfection, thinking it's a typo. "Disinsection" is a technical term referring specifically to the decontamination of aircraft for customs. I changed it back. :-)