![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The part about rifle grenades in the SEALAB II section makes absolutely no sense at all to an outside reader. It either needs a lot of context (or at least a source) or consideration for removal if it isn't really important to the facility. -- 153.31.113.20 ( talk) 18:33, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
I deleted an entry about tuffy the dolphin supplying the SEALAB base. It was "sourced" to a broken link. This looks like vandalism to me, however if someone can provide verification for this incredulous claim, then please revert Gakrivas ( talk) 13:40, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
The article currently says "SEALAB III used a refurbished SEALAB II habitat". Now I would expect that to read the refurbished SEALAB II habitat, unless more were built but not deployed. What's up with that? -- BjKa ( talk) 10:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on SEALAB. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:52, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
If I understand the article correctly, SEALABs I and III were recovered, but II was left on the sea floor. Is this right? And if so, why was II not recovered? (The indicated reference - at http://hpwren.ucsd.edu/news/020213.html - says, quote, "the habitat was pulled up".) Elsquared ( talk) 23:15, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Brmarie (
article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Brmarie ( talk) 19:12, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
The end of the SEALAB II section states
This expedition was the first return to the site since the habitat was moved. [1]
But I don’t see any mention prior to this of the habitat having been “moved.” The provided reference doesn’t clarify this. Can a more knowledgeable editor add some context? Zeligf ( talk) 13:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
References
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The part about rifle grenades in the SEALAB II section makes absolutely no sense at all to an outside reader. It either needs a lot of context (or at least a source) or consideration for removal if it isn't really important to the facility. -- 153.31.113.20 ( talk) 18:33, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
I deleted an entry about tuffy the dolphin supplying the SEALAB base. It was "sourced" to a broken link. This looks like vandalism to me, however if someone can provide verification for this incredulous claim, then please revert Gakrivas ( talk) 13:40, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
The article currently says "SEALAB III used a refurbished SEALAB II habitat". Now I would expect that to read the refurbished SEALAB II habitat, unless more were built but not deployed. What's up with that? -- BjKa ( talk) 10:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on SEALAB. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 20:52, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
If I understand the article correctly, SEALABs I and III were recovered, but II was left on the sea floor. Is this right? And if so, why was II not recovered? (The indicated reference - at http://hpwren.ucsd.edu/news/020213.html - says, quote, "the habitat was pulled up".) Elsquared ( talk) 23:15, 3 August 2020 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Brmarie (
article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Brmarie ( talk) 19:12, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
The end of the SEALAB II section states
This expedition was the first return to the site since the habitat was moved. [1]
But I don’t see any mention prior to this of the habitat having been “moved.” The provided reference doesn’t clarify this. Can a more knowledgeable editor add some context? Zeligf ( talk) 13:25, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
References