This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Networking Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Networking task force (assessed as Low-importance). Internet Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted from this draft on 24 November 2016 by reviewer Bradv ( talk · contribs).

The name SCP is not used anymore by SAP, but the underlying products/services are still available to the enduser under the brand SAP Technology Platform. There has not been any service disruption or major cancellation of services except for what's normal (my opinion) from a product life cycle management perspective. IMHO, a better term for the status is rebranded, almost anything is better than 'Discontinued'. (se the ref in first paragraph)

Any thoughts? Wikkitekki ( talk) 15:04, 9 December 2022 (UTC) reply

2402:8100:2463:45AE:0:0:0:1 (
talk) 00:28, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
reply