![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
As it is, the station links are links to the areas around the stations rather than the stations themselves. Is that what we really want? Ghent 15:38, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
The current line overview is not easy to read, and other metropolitan trains like the London Underground and the Copenhagen Metro have separate articles for lines. Therefore, I think that the lines deserve their own pages in order to clean the main page up. What do you think? Ghent 16:19, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Articles created. Didn't see your comments about naming until afterwards -- be bold and move things around if you feel like it. I have used the names that I think are most common in railfan literature, but they may not be widely used by laypersons. In particular Vestbanen is probably not well known outside railfan (and professional) circles, but on the other hand I don't think there is any common name apart from constructions like "the S-train towards Tåstrup". Henning Makholm 00:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Isn't there a H+ train running from Farum to Frederikssund? its mentioned on all the maps and i took it every other day for 2 months while staying in Copenhagen.
As most of the German S-Bahn are listed as Rapid Transit(although theres additionel underground in most of the cities), I thought this might be in that category as well. As for the criteria mentioned at the Rapid Transit-article, theres no problem. Many of the stations are in densely populated areas. -- Kaare Dybvad ( talk) 15:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
The discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 April 14#Category:S-trains in Copenhagen could use input from watchers of this article. – Henning Makholm ( talk) 14:13, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
I was thinking that the top image should show the current generation of trains that is good, but perhaps an image of a train without graffiti would be more suitable? AadaamS ( talk) 08:34, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Is the list of elevated stations meant to be complete? If so, at least 2½ are missing: Hvidovre, Virum and the westbound track and its platform at Rødovre station. -- Klausok ( talk) 07:26, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
I think "S-train" only deals with Copenhagen S-train (S-tog). So I think this page name should be merged with a very updated S-Bahn article. It should go through the general concepts of S-tog/S-Bahn. Urban rapid transport, very metro-like in Copenhagen, Berlin and Hamburg. While Vienna S-Bahn seems to be more of a suburban to city transport only (though with constant departures between each train departure, unlike commuter trains). Also most other S-trains in Germany uses common tracks (partly or entirely). Please try to understand that this isn't any kind of fight between Denmark and Germany. S-train is English for both S-tog & S-Bahn. And of course the entire content of this article should only be moved to the new article Copenhagen S-Train (which no longer should point to this page). It's only a "short castling" in chess terminology. A future S-train article will just deal with the general concepts which S-trains have in common. It's not a threat on this article. I'll be waiting for inputs. Thanks. Boeing720 ( talk) 01:55, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
That is what the text says. The diagram shows line H skipping Langgade and Peter Bangsvej.-- Klausok ( talk) 13:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on S-train (Copenhagen). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.nwe.siemens.com/denmark/internet/dk/mobility/rullende_materiel/naerbaner/Documents/S-tog_SA_DSB_eng.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:49, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Like many above, I found this page to be of low quality, confusing, hard to read and full of out dated and contradictory information. For example, the number of stations quoted differed four times across the page. This does not provide any sense of confidence. I embarked on improving the material. I have taken into account some of the (now dated) commentary here. The aim was to be more accurate whilst improving clarity. This involved removing duplicated materials and moving material into the correct section. I moved more detailed information into the "List of Copenhagen S-Train Lines" Wikpedia page, as that seemed more appropriate. The edit then led me into the List of Copenhagen S-Train Stations Wikipedia page!
A few issues: 1. I cannot find any source material for the number of stations. I used the 86 figure which is used on the Danish language S-tog page. 2. There is little original source material. Many of the line changes and additions may be in Danish language newspapers. There is just one authoritative book on the subject. Some of the information was contained in DSB updates or bulletins which may be archived in Denmark. 3. The Danish and English language pages are quite different in layout and emphasis. I have removed, corrected or updated the material on the English page that was incorrect (and contradicted) the Danish version! Emjaikey ( talk) 07:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
As it is, the station links are links to the areas around the stations rather than the stations themselves. Is that what we really want? Ghent 15:38, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
The current line overview is not easy to read, and other metropolitan trains like the London Underground and the Copenhagen Metro have separate articles for lines. Therefore, I think that the lines deserve their own pages in order to clean the main page up. What do you think? Ghent 16:19, 21 May 2006 (UTC)
Articles created. Didn't see your comments about naming until afterwards -- be bold and move things around if you feel like it. I have used the names that I think are most common in railfan literature, but they may not be widely used by laypersons. In particular Vestbanen is probably not well known outside railfan (and professional) circles, but on the other hand I don't think there is any common name apart from constructions like "the S-train towards Tåstrup". Henning Makholm 00:24, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
Isn't there a H+ train running from Farum to Frederikssund? its mentioned on all the maps and i took it every other day for 2 months while staying in Copenhagen.
As most of the German S-Bahn are listed as Rapid Transit(although theres additionel underground in most of the cities), I thought this might be in that category as well. As for the criteria mentioned at the Rapid Transit-article, theres no problem. Many of the stations are in densely populated areas. -- Kaare Dybvad ( talk) 15:14, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
The discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2009 April 14#Category:S-trains in Copenhagen could use input from watchers of this article. – Henning Makholm ( talk) 14:13, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
I was thinking that the top image should show the current generation of trains that is good, but perhaps an image of a train without graffiti would be more suitable? AadaamS ( talk) 08:34, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
Is the list of elevated stations meant to be complete? If so, at least 2½ are missing: Hvidovre, Virum and the westbound track and its platform at Rødovre station. -- Klausok ( talk) 07:26, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
I think "S-train" only deals with Copenhagen S-train (S-tog). So I think this page name should be merged with a very updated S-Bahn article. It should go through the general concepts of S-tog/S-Bahn. Urban rapid transport, very metro-like in Copenhagen, Berlin and Hamburg. While Vienna S-Bahn seems to be more of a suburban to city transport only (though with constant departures between each train departure, unlike commuter trains). Also most other S-trains in Germany uses common tracks (partly or entirely). Please try to understand that this isn't any kind of fight between Denmark and Germany. S-train is English for both S-tog & S-Bahn. And of course the entire content of this article should only be moved to the new article Copenhagen S-Train (which no longer should point to this page). It's only a "short castling" in chess terminology. A future S-train article will just deal with the general concepts which S-trains have in common. It's not a threat on this article. I'll be waiting for inputs. Thanks. Boeing720 ( talk) 01:55, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
That is what the text says. The diagram shows line H skipping Langgade and Peter Bangsvej.-- Klausok ( talk) 13:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on S-train (Copenhagen). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.nwe.siemens.com/denmark/internet/dk/mobility/rullende_materiel/naerbaner/Documents/S-tog_SA_DSB_eng.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:49, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Like many above, I found this page to be of low quality, confusing, hard to read and full of out dated and contradictory information. For example, the number of stations quoted differed four times across the page. This does not provide any sense of confidence. I embarked on improving the material. I have taken into account some of the (now dated) commentary here. The aim was to be more accurate whilst improving clarity. This involved removing duplicated materials and moving material into the correct section. I moved more detailed information into the "List of Copenhagen S-Train Lines" Wikpedia page, as that seemed more appropriate. The edit then led me into the List of Copenhagen S-Train Stations Wikipedia page!
A few issues: 1. I cannot find any source material for the number of stations. I used the 86 figure which is used on the Danish language S-tog page. 2. There is little original source material. Many of the line changes and additions may be in Danish language newspapers. There is just one authoritative book on the subject. Some of the information was contained in DSB updates or bulletins which may be archived in Denmark. 3. The Danish and English language pages are quite different in layout and emphasis. I have removed, corrected or updated the material on the English page that was incorrect (and contradicted) the Danish version! Emjaikey ( talk) 07:07, 26 July 2021 (UTC)