This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / Russian & Soviet This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

The tandem HEAT on the table has the same penetration as the normal HEAT,there would be no point in having a tandem if it does the same damage as a normal HEAT. Dudtz 11/8/06 7:56 PM ET

Versus RHA - I'm sure the single and double HEAT warheads do the same damage, however versus armour protected by ERA, the single HEAT warhead would do almost no damage, where as the double HEAT warhead would do about the same damage (perhaps a little less). Megapixie 01:24, 9 November 2006 (UTC) reply

But after the first metal melts trough as far as it can go,the second one ahould be able to travel trough easier if no ERA and/ or Chobham. is used. Dudtz 11/10/06 7:45 PM ET