This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
S-200 (bioremediation) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 13 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Can anyone out there verify any of this - looks like this is a mini-infomercial from the product manufacturer?
I like the idea of the product, but can't find any information out there that doesn't sounds like it was canned from the company. All of the references listed here are hosted on the manufacturer's website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.10.83.153 ( talk) 15:35, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
I've removed content that stated that this is on an EPA "approved list". Not only was that content sourced to to bad sources (PDF photostats of paper letters, self-published by someone with a direct commercial interest on xyr own WWW site, that could have been put together by computer for all that we know) but even were the sources reliable, they explicitly say that such listing "does not constitute approval". Uncle G ( talk) 23:48, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
with the recent changes (which are good, IMHO), the article's name should be changed to 'S200'. Would that screw up the AfD? NoCal100 ( talk) 00:11, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
S-200 (bioremediation) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article was nominated for deletion on 13 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Can anyone out there verify any of this - looks like this is a mini-infomercial from the product manufacturer?
I like the idea of the product, but can't find any information out there that doesn't sounds like it was canned from the company. All of the references listed here are hosted on the manufacturer's website. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.10.83.153 ( talk) 15:35, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
I've removed content that stated that this is on an EPA "approved list". Not only was that content sourced to to bad sources (PDF photostats of paper letters, self-published by someone with a direct commercial interest on xyr own WWW site, that could have been put together by computer for all that we know) but even were the sources reliable, they explicitly say that such listing "does not constitute approval". Uncle G ( talk) 23:48, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
with the recent changes (which are good, IMHO), the article's name should be changed to 'S200'. Would that screw up the AfD? NoCal100 ( talk) 00:11, 14 June 2009 (UTC)