![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Sørensen similarity index page were merged into Sørensen-Dice coefficent on February 25, 2013. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Hi folks,
I don't agree with your formula and deleted the "2" on top!!
Greetings from Germany (where the "Sørensen similarity index" hopefully isn't different from yours) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.83.155.191 ( talk • contribs)
Hello everyone
I brought back the "2" in the upper term as this is absolutely correct. (e.g. Anne E. Magurran, Measuring Biological Diversity, p. 173) Greetings from Germany, too.
201.25.251.153 ( talk) 18:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
This is identical to Dice's coefficient. I think the two articles should be merged, but I don't know what would be the best name for the merged article. The formula is sometimes called the Sørensen-Dice coefficent. Maghnus ( talk) 19:51, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Agreed on the merge -- the present situation is just confusing. I'd call the combined page Sørensen-Dice coefficent and have all necessary redirects -- i.e. "Sørensen similarity index", "Dice coefficient", maybe "Sørensen distance" as I have also seen this.
Also the link to an (unwritten) article "Czekanowski similarity index" at the bottom -- it's just not different enough, is it? I think it should be included in this article. Octopod ( talk) 19:14, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Octopod
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Sørensen similarity index page were merged into Sørensen-Dice coefficent on February 25, 2013. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Hi folks,
I don't agree with your formula and deleted the "2" on top!!
Greetings from Germany (where the "Sørensen similarity index" hopefully isn't different from yours) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.83.155.191 ( talk • contribs)
Hello everyone
I brought back the "2" in the upper term as this is absolutely correct. (e.g. Anne E. Magurran, Measuring Biological Diversity, p. 173) Greetings from Germany, too.
201.25.251.153 ( talk) 18:07, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
This is identical to Dice's coefficient. I think the two articles should be merged, but I don't know what would be the best name for the merged article. The formula is sometimes called the Sørensen-Dice coefficent. Maghnus ( talk) 19:51, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
Agreed on the merge -- the present situation is just confusing. I'd call the combined page Sørensen-Dice coefficent and have all necessary redirects -- i.e. "Sørensen similarity index", "Dice coefficient", maybe "Sørensen distance" as I have also seen this.
Also the link to an (unwritten) article "Czekanowski similarity index" at the bottom -- it's just not different enough, is it? I think it should be included in this article. Octopod ( talk) 19:14, 26 March 2012 (UTC)Octopod