This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Based on the description as being a titration of the free-amine content ( yeast assimilable nitrogen) and reaction that involves formaldehyde, I adjusted the wording to focus on the amine part of the structures. But the only reaction that appears to consume base (leaving the excess unreacted to be titrated) is the deprotonation of the carboxylic acid. The amine chemistry does not appear "titratable" in this way. I have therefore tagged the whole article as contradictory. I don't dispute the addition of the winemaking content, but it's not consistent with the reaction as given. I don't have access to its ref to see how much chemistry is discusses. For a name reaction involving a specific chemical reaction, we really need a chemistry ref to discuss the chemistry. DMacks ( talk) 02:17, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Based on the description as being a titration of the free-amine content ( yeast assimilable nitrogen) and reaction that involves formaldehyde, I adjusted the wording to focus on the amine part of the structures. But the only reaction that appears to consume base (leaving the excess unreacted to be titrated) is the deprotonation of the carboxylic acid. The amine chemistry does not appear "titratable" in this way. I have therefore tagged the whole article as contradictory. I don't dispute the addition of the winemaking content, but it's not consistent with the reaction as given. I don't have access to its ref to see how much chemistry is discusses. For a name reaction involving a specific chemical reaction, we really need a chemistry ref to discuss the chemistry. DMacks ( talk) 02:17, 15 June 2015 (UTC)