This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects. This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Low-importance).

This page has a Metric-Imperial error. Does anyone know the correct number? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.21.240.150 ( talk) 09:07, 11 February 2010 (UTC) reply

It looks like only the Imperial numbers were wrong, and since they aren't usually used in scientific articles anyway, I simply removed them. -- Patteroast ( talk) 15:38, 11 February 2010 (UTC) reply

This moon is really, really tiny and its discovery raises some interesting questions. When is something a moon, and when is it considered just one of the countless pieces of rubble constituting Saturn's rings? Steinbach ( talk) 22:35, 29 September 2013 (UTC) reply

We follow our sources. If they say that an object is satellite then we will follow. In this case the object received a designation compatible with it being a satellite and is actually called a satellite or moonlet in the cite sources. Ruslik_ Zero 19:43, 28 October 2013 (UTC) reply