Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Tea with toast ( talk) 05:38, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
While this article contains a wealth of information, I fear it may be too technical for most readers. Below, I have included a few areas could use improvement:
I asked the creator of the text if we can move it to the isotops of Rutherfordium where already a copy exists. -- Stone ( talk) 05:17, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
A technical note:
I do not have the time right now to read through all of it, but I thought I would make you aware of these issues needing to be addressed in the mean time. -- Tea with toast ( talk) 00:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
I have finished my initial review of the page, and have found a few more issues needing to be addressed in addition to those listed above:
I will allow 1 week for changes to be made to this article and will give my final review at that time. -- Tea with toast ( talk) 17:10, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
I am glad to see the many improvements that have been made to this article thus far. I appreciate the work that has been done, especially on the lead section. However, it has been more than 1 week since I gave my notice, and the "Chemical yields of isotopes" section remains unsourced. I am sorry to deny the article GA status for that reason. I hope you will continue to improve this article so that I may be re-nominated in the future. Best of luck. -- Tea with toast ( talk) 01:35, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Tea with toast ( talk) 05:38, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
While this article contains a wealth of information, I fear it may be too technical for most readers. Below, I have included a few areas could use improvement:
I asked the creator of the text if we can move it to the isotops of Rutherfordium where already a copy exists. -- Stone ( talk) 05:17, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
A technical note:
I do not have the time right now to read through all of it, but I thought I would make you aware of these issues needing to be addressed in the mean time. -- Tea with toast ( talk) 00:32, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
I have finished my initial review of the page, and have found a few more issues needing to be addressed in addition to those listed above:
I will allow 1 week for changes to be made to this article and will give my final review at that time. -- Tea with toast ( talk) 17:10, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
I am glad to see the many improvements that have been made to this article thus far. I appreciate the work that has been done, especially on the lead section. However, it has been more than 1 week since I gave my notice, and the "Chemical yields of isotopes" section remains unsourced. I am sorry to deny the article GA status for that reason. I hope you will continue to improve this article so that I may be re-nominated in the future. Best of luck. -- Tea with toast ( talk) 01:35, 15 April 2010 (UTC)