Ruth Norman is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
	This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on October 12, 2012.
Article milestones Date Process Result August 19, 2012 Good article nominee Listed August 22, 2012 Peer review Reviewed September 11, 2012 Featured article candidate Promoted A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " Did you know?" column on August 21, 2012. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Ruth Norman wore brightly colored clothing in an attempt to imitate the attire of extraterrestrials? Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the " On this day..." column on July 12, 2017, August 18, 2018, August 18, 2020, and August 18, 2022. Current status: Featured article

This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles California Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Religion: New religious movements Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Low-importance). San Diego Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject San Diego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to San Diego and San Diego County on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.San DiegoWikipedia:WikiProject San DiegoTemplate:WikiProject San DiegoSan Diego articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject San Diego To-do: history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Assess : Rate San Diego related articles from Category:Unassessed San Diego articles and Category:Unknown-importance San Diego articles with the {{ WikiProject San Diego}} project banner. Cleanup : A cleanup listing for this project is available: clean-up listing for San_Diego Expand : San Miguel Mountain, Most articles from Category:Stub-Class San Diego articles. Photo : Request photos that are needed from Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in San Diego County, California to include in each article. Stubs : Work on articles in Category:San Diego County, California geography stubs. Other : * Add {{ WikiProject San Diego}} project banner to related articles' talk pages and assess. Maintain and further improve articles already of high-quality. Get San Diego into Featured article status. Improve groups of articles to meet the standards for a Good or Featured Topic. Women in Religion Low‑importance This article is within the scope of the Women in Religion WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in religion. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Women in ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject Women in ReligionTemplate:WikiProject Women in ReligionWomen in Religion articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women's History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ruth Norman/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Crisco 1492 ( talk · contribs) 03:58, 18 August 2012 (UTC) reply

• I'll take this! —  Crisco 1492 ( talk) 03:58, 18 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Checklist

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
	1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
	2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Fine
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Fine
	2c. it contains no original research.	Fine
	3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Fine
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Fine
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Fine
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Per definition
	6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	See below
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Pending

Comments

1

• "In her early to mid-teen years, she labored as a fruit packer and a maid, giving most of her income to her father, who she later described as abusive." - A lot of clauses. Could you split this?
  • Sure, split. Mark Arsten ( talk) 17:14, 18 August 2012 (UTC) reply
• Unarius' or Unarian?
  • Not sure which is best, but I've standardized them. Mark Arsten ( talk) 17:14, 18 August 2012 (UTC) reply
• Diana Tumminia - What's she do?
  • I'm not too sure what you're looking for here, I noted that she published a study of the group in 2005 though. Mark Arsten ( talk) 17:14, 18 August 2012 (UTC) reply
• Using this talent - Typing as a talent? Really?
  • Hmm, I was trying not to repeat "skill", rephrased. Mark Arsten ( talk) 17:14, 18 August 2012 (UTC) reply
• "Seeking to popularize his channeling, in 1954, Ernest and Ruth an organization," - Missing a word.
  • Ahh, good catch. Mark Arsten ( talk) 17:14, 18 August 2012 (UTC) reply
• Ioshanna... does this have a meaning?
  • Possibly, but not that I've noticed in the sources. Mark Arsten ( talk) 17:14, 18 August 2012 (UTC) reply
• Michiel - link to Michael (archangel), assuming they're the same? Same with Raphael (archangel). Perhaps a link to archangel too.
  • I presume they're the same, or similar enough to justify a link. I'm sure Unarius has some novel perspectives on these angels. Mark Arsten ( talk) 17:14, 18 August 2012 (UTC) reply
• "property near Jamul, California, to serve as a landing site for the Space Brothers." - You didn't explain who the Space Brothers are yet
  • Good catch, moved the explanation. Mark Arsten ( talk) 17:14, 18 August 2012 (UTC) reply
• "six core myths" - Myths or beliefs?
  • There more or less the same in terms of the study of religion, but I rephrased for clarity. Mark Arsten ( talk) 17:14, 18 August 2012 (UTC) reply
• "Weber's concept of charismatic leadership." - Who?
  • Explained, and it turns out we have an article on the concept too. Mark Arsten ( talk) 17:14, 18 August 2012 (UTC) reply
• Perhaps merge "last years" and 80s under one heading
  • Sure, that works. Mark Arsten ( talk) 17:14, 18 August 2012 (UTC) reply
• I did a copyedit, be sure to double check.
  • Looks good, only one error introduced. Mark Arsten ( talk) 17:14, 18 August 2012 (UTC) reply
• Fix disambiguation needed tag. —  Crisco 1492 ( talk) 06:39, 18 August 2012 (UTC) reply
  • Hadn't realized that there were two people named James R. Lewis with articles, wow. Mark Arsten ( talk) 17:14, 18 August 2012 (UTC) reply

2

• I'm a bit concerned about the heavy reliance (overwhelming majority of footnotes) on Tumminia as a reference. It seems that a broader-based reference set would be preferable.-- Piledhigheranddeeper ( talk) 20:49, 21 August 2012 (UTC) reply
  • That would be a good idea for the peer review. —  Crisco 1492 ( talk) 23:53, 21 August 2012 (UTC) reply

6

• Any images at all possible? Even fair-use ones of her? Image of Tesla ( like this)? Image of the Unarius Academy of Science?
  • Yeah, I had been meaning to add one of Ruth in, hadn't gotten around to it though. Just uploaded File:Ernest and Ruth Norman.jpg. Tesla's a good idea. I should check if there are any Wikipedians in the area that could get a pic of their headquarters. Mark Arsten ( talk) 17:14, 18 August 2012 (UTC) reply
• AGF on offline sources.

In the introductory paragraph it is stated that Norman was a native of California, but in the "Early Life and Marriage" paragraph it states that she was born in Indiana. This seems contradictory. ; Lawrence Ames ( talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.124.92.254 ( talk) 16:11, 12 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Further discussion

• On hold for a week. —  Crisco 1492 ( talk) 06:34, 18 August 2012 (UTC) reply
• Looks peachy, passing. —  Crisco 1492 ( talk) 01:16, 19 August 2012 (UTC) reply

The sentence "Kirkpatrick and Tumminia state that the Urantian canon appears to be impenetrable..." had the following astute comment: <Urantian or Unarian? Urantian is a different kettle of fish>. As Urantia is a new religious movement as well, the source might conceivably have mentioned it (in which case the sentence would be irrelevant), but a quick check shows Unarius was meant after all. Lusanaherandraton ( talk) 23:32, 21 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Yeah, thanks for doing that. I screwed that up, I have written about the Urantian canon in the past as well, so I really should have caught that! Mark Arsten ( talk) 23:36, 21 August 2012 (UTC) reply

Should she be placed in Category:People from San Diego, California, Category:People from Pasadena, California, Category:People from Indianapolis, Indiana and Category:New Age writers (did she write any books herself?).( User:Mercurywoodrose) 50.193.19.66 ( talk) 18:51, 12 October 2012 (UTC) reply

I would answer yes to all those questions. Thanks, Mark Arsten ( talk) 18:55, 12 October 2012 (UTC) reply

Hi, +1 I agree with the person that undid (undo'ed) the large edit where an anonymous person removed a large paragraph about Norman betting $1000 that the Earth would be visited by aliens within a certain year. There were good cite/ref's. Glad that this edit occurred and undid the large removal! I was going to copy paste the removed text to the Talk page at least for posterity.. --Peter aka Vid2vid ( talk) 02:08, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply

oops here is the "diff" link.. --Peter aka Vid2vid ( talk) 02:12, 2 August 2019 (UTC) reply

I am very uncomfortable with the following being stated in wikivoice: "The couple discussed numerous details about their past lives.... The existence of past lives is a fringe belief and I think something like "alleged past lives" is more appropriate. Courtesy ping Mark Arsten. ---  C& C ( Coffeeandcrumbs) 19:17, 17 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Fair enough. That wasn't my intention, of course. Mark Arsten ( talk) 23:03, 20 August 2020 (UTC) reply