Please enter your answer to the question in the Survey with a brief statement. Please do not respond to the statements of other editors. Back-and-forth discussion is permitted in the Discussion section. (That's what it's for.)
Note to closer: If there is a consensus that Belarus should be listed, but not as to how it should be listed, please either close with the least strong choice, or recommend a second RFC for resolution.
@
My very best wishes:WP:CONS in this situation would likely be a great start to make a change. Technical implementation can be done later if there is an agreement, especially because this article is popular and requires objective presentation of facts. I believe "co-belligerent" is a perfect middle choice because Lukashenko's statements and Belarus' allowance for the Russian Army to use its territory to invade Ukraine and to shot missiles towards Ukraine had clearly demonstrated that the current Ukraine is an enemy of Lukashenko's Belarus. I requested a RFC for article
Russo-Ukrainian War because in article
Russian invasion of Ukraine the role of Belarus is already quite fairly presented. --
Pofka (
talk)
21:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC)reply
No, it was reverted. OK. But I suggest we include option (b) as proposed by mediator. It is entirely possible that new consensus will override the old one. But I think we should simply follow the consensus of previous RfC
here and the new RfC may not be needed.
My very best wishes (
talk)
03:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC)reply
User:My very best wishes - I am interested in how you found this draft RFC, because I had thought that other editors would not see it until we finished discussing it at
DRN. Has it been listed in one of the lists of open RFCs? If so, which one? Has someone put a reference to it in a WikiProject? Please advise me as to how you found it.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
23:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC)reply
(Reply to ping). I checked the DRN discussion (it was visible), and then followed your link provided in "Third statement by moderator (Ukrainian War)". Since I was not a party to the dispute, I just commented on article talk page and also here. Good luck with keeping your good work on DRN!
My very best wishes (
talk)
23:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)reply
Please enter your answer to the question in the Survey with a brief statement. Please do not respond to the statements of other editors. Back-and-forth discussion is permitted in the Discussion section. (That's what it's for.)
Note to closer: If there is a consensus that Belarus should be listed, but not as to how it should be listed, please either close with the least strong choice, or recommend a second RFC for resolution.
@
My very best wishes:WP:CONS in this situation would likely be a great start to make a change. Technical implementation can be done later if there is an agreement, especially because this article is popular and requires objective presentation of facts. I believe "co-belligerent" is a perfect middle choice because Lukashenko's statements and Belarus' allowance for the Russian Army to use its territory to invade Ukraine and to shot missiles towards Ukraine had clearly demonstrated that the current Ukraine is an enemy of Lukashenko's Belarus. I requested a RFC for article
Russo-Ukrainian War because in article
Russian invasion of Ukraine the role of Belarus is already quite fairly presented. --
Pofka (
talk)
21:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC)reply
No, it was reverted. OK. But I suggest we include option (b) as proposed by mediator. It is entirely possible that new consensus will override the old one. But I think we should simply follow the consensus of previous RfC
here and the new RfC may not be needed.
My very best wishes (
talk)
03:19, 12 March 2024 (UTC)reply
User:My very best wishes - I am interested in how you found this draft RFC, because I had thought that other editors would not see it until we finished discussing it at
DRN. Has it been listed in one of the lists of open RFCs? If so, which one? Has someone put a reference to it in a WikiProject? Please advise me as to how you found it.
Robert McClenon (
talk)
23:42, 14 March 2024 (UTC)reply
(Reply to ping). I checked the DRN discussion (it was visible), and then followed your link provided in "Third statement by moderator (Ukrainian War)". Since I was not a party to the dispute, I just commented on article talk page and also here. Good luck with keeping your good work on DRN!
My very best wishes (
talk)
23:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)reply