This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Too much propaganda. (unsigned by anon)05:57, 9 June 2005 81.213.13.241 (Talk)
The result of this war is Ottoman victory. Ottoman Empire captured Chyryhyn 8 years long. Petro The Great took again in second Russo Türkish War 1686 1700. We would be happy when you revert it to Ottoman victory from indecisive. Thank you i have also link with Ottoman victory Historiker123454 ( talk) 09:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Ottoman Took Chyryhyn 8 years along unter 1684. İt is over time of War (1676 1681) Hakan255 ( talk) 08:18, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Ottoman Took Chyryhyn 8 years along until 1684. İt is over time of War (1676 1681) Hakan255 ( talk) 08:21, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Ottoman took Chyryhyn From 1678 until 1686 (I Corrected it) Hakan255 ( talk) 08:34, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
@-Irpen it's more that you are Russian. Hakan255 ( talk) 23:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Davies, Brian L., Warfare, state and society on the Black Sea steppe, 1500-1700, Routledge, 2007.
Page 172.
@Kansas Bear
Hakan255 (
talk) 16:49, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Please edit according to the Turkish version of:
http://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/1676-1681_Osmanl%C4%B1-Rus_Sava%C5%9F%C4%B1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warlordcry ( talk • contribs) 15:29, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: nomination withdrawn. Jenks24 ( talk) 15:16, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Usre:Karak1lc1k has added "Decisive Ottoman victory" using
this questionable source. This "source" does not state that the Russo-Turkish war 1676-81 was a Decisive Ottoman victory.
"The war of 1676–81. In 1677 a Turkish–Crimean Tatar army invaded and ravaged Right-Bank Ukraine and took the capital, Chyhyryn. The Turks' attempt to retain Chyhyryn was repelled by a Russian-Ukrainian force led by Prince G. Romodanovsky and Hetman Ivan Samoilovych (see Chyhyryn campaigns, 1677–8), and the Turks were forced to retreat. In 1681 the Ottoman Porte, the Crimean Khanate, and Muscovy signed the Treaty of Bakhchesarai, according to which Muscovy had sovereignty over the Hetman state and the Zaporizhia, both sides agreed not to colonize the Southern Ukrainian lands between the Boh River and the Dnister River for 20 years, and Turkey retained control of the southern Kyiv region, the Bratslav region, and Podilia."
Therefore, Karak11c1k's edit is
original research. --
Kansas Bear (
talk) 15:10, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
It was descive Ottoman victory. Ottoman army captured Chyryn and owned it 8 years long. The Russia Tsardom captured it again in second 1686 1700 Russo Türkish war Historiker123454 ( talk) 21:39, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Lol you Russians want only take sources from Russians Editors. Hakan255 ( talk) 13:56, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
You take only sources from Russians authors also when it lies Hakan255 ( talk) 13:58, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
An IP has added "Ottoman victory" using Online Britannica as a source, yet according to A Military History of Russia: From Ivan the Terrible to the War in Chechnya, by David R. Stone, page 41, "The indecisive Russo-Turkish War from 1676 to 1681 centered on control of the fortress of Chigririn, just west of the Dnepr River." -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 16:06, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Hallo. I would like correct the result because there is contradiction ! Ottoman Empire won this 1676 1681 war. Russia Tsardom took Cossacks Hetman after that Sultan Mehmed Avci sent Ibrahim pasha with Ottoman Army to Chyhyryn to capture, but its failed, then the Sultan sent Merzifonlu Kara Mustafa pasha and he took finally Chyhyryn with Ottoman army. Ottoman Empire owned Chyhyryn 31 years long. As result are written Ottoman Victory on Italian, Polish, French sites or books. We were happy when you correct it. Thank you Historiker123454 ( talk) 17:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Notes
^ Davies, Brian L., Warfare, state and society on the Black Sea steppe, 1500-1700, (Routledge, 2007), 160. ^ a b Davies, Brian L., Warfare, state and society on the Black Sea steppe, 1500-1700, 161. ^ Paxton, John and John Traynor, Leaders of Russia and the Soviet Union, (Taylor & Francis Books Inc., 2004), 195.
References
Davies, Brian L., Warfare, state and society on the Black Sea steppe, 1500-1700, Routledge, 2007. Paxton, John and John Traynor, Leaders of Russia and the Soviet Union, Taylor & Francis Books Inc., 2004.
http://dictionnaire.sensagent.leparisien.fr/Russo-Turkish%20War%20(1676%E2%80%931681)/en-en/
Historiker123454 Historiker123454 ( talk) 17:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
I wrote to you that Ottoman Empire captured Chigirin in 1678 until 1712 final victory for the 1676 1681 Russo Türkish War Historiker123454 ( talk) 04:11, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
When Ottoman captured Chyhyryn 31 years along after occupy then it is "Ottoman Victory" because the War ends in 1681 Hakan255 ( talk) 14:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Taken from above:
I sent you the website again where is written it is Otomman victory
http://dictionnaire.sensagent.leparisien.fr/Russo-Turkish%20War%20(1676%E2%80%931681)/en-en/
Also in Polish, Italian, Türkish Wikipedia it is written Ottoman victory — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historiker123454 ( talk • contribs) 03:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Historiker123454 Historiker123454 ( talk) 03:30, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Kansas Bear
There are written in other Wikipedia Languages like on Italian, Polish, Türkish, Romanian as Ottoman victory Here are the links
On Italian Wikipedia https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guerra_russo-turca_(1676-1681)
On Polish Wikipedia https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wojna_rosyjsko-turecka_(1674%E2%80%931681)
On Turkish Wikipedia https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/1676-1681_Osmanl%C4%B1-Rus_Sava%C5%9F%C4%B1
On Romanian Wikipedia https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C4%83zboiul_Ruso-Turc_(1676%E2%80%931681)
also on French English la pariese site is it written Ottoman victory — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historiker123454 ( talk • contribs) 03:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Historiker123454 Historiker123454 ( talk) 03:31, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
I sent you the website again where is written it is Otomman victory
http://dictionnaire.sensagent.leparisien.fr/Russo-Turkish%20War%20(1676%E2%80%931681)/en-en/
Also in Polish, Italian, Türkish Wikipedia it is written Ottoman victory
Historiker123454 Historiker123454 ( talk) 04:02, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Kansas Bear
There are written in other Wikipedia Languages like on Italian, Polish, Türkish, Romanian as Ottoman victory Here are the links
On Italian Wikipedia https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guerra_russo-turca_(1676-1681)
On Polish Wikipedia https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wojna_rosyjsko-turecka_(1674%E2%80%931681)
On Turkish Wikipedia https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/1676-1681_Osmanl%C4%B1-Rus_Sava%C5%9F%C4%B1
On Romanian Wikipedia https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C4%83zboiul_Ruso-Turc_(1676%E2%80%931681)
also on French English la pariese site is it written Ottoman victory
Historiker123454 Historiker123454 ( talk) 04:03, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Ottomans captured the Chyhyryn after the war. So why indecisive? It was an Ottoman victory — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mnl0g 044 ( talk • contribs) 22:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
The result of 1676-1681 Russo-Turkish War is Ottoman Victory and KansasBear delete the several sources and move to indecisive with 1 source and he means "Wikipedia is written using reliable secondary sources"
He wrote In Campaign of 1678 in the beginning only the attack of Russians, but he leave out the the counterattack and the victory of the Turks.
Or after capturing Chyhyryn, Turks attacks the Russians army beyond the Dnieper and after offensive Russian army reatret to Kiev and Turks seized then Kaniv and he wrote in Propaganda:
"The Russian army retreated beyond the Dnieper, beating off the pursuing Turkish army, which would finally leave them in peace. Later the Turks seized Kanev established the power of Yuri Khmelnitsky on the Right-bank Ukraine, but did not dare to go to Kiev, where the Russian troops were stationed."
Summary of this war: The 1676-1681 Ottoman-Russian War, or Muscovite Campaign, was the first great war between the Ottoman Empire and the Russian Tsardom. During this war, Merzifonlu Kara Mustafa Pasha became the grand vizier. As a result of the 5-year war, the Russian Tsardom, which could not be strengthened was defeated, and with the Treaty of Bakhchisarai on January 31, 1681, Chyhyryn Fortress and the rest of the Ukraine were left to the Ottomans.
according to the treaty Chyhyryn Fortress and rest of the Ukraine were left to the Ottomans. Aftermath capturing Chyhyryn fortress, in the continuation battle in the near from Chyhyryn Russian Army had leave the battle and retreat from this battle to Kiev. Ottoman army march 140 km into Russian territory and captured Kaniv and hold for decades years after (Russo Turkish War 1676-1681) war.
Notes
Davies, Brian L., Warfare, state and society on the Black Sea steppe, 1500-1700 " page number 172 is written Victory for Ottoman and Moscow loss Chyhyryn.
In Rhoads Murphey "Ottoman Warfare 1500-1700" book is written; "In the decades preceding the Ottomans’ attempted siege of Vienna in 1683 Ottoman
armies had successfully prosecuted single-front wars in Hungary (the sieges of Varad
[Oradea] in 1660 and Uyvar [N. Zamky] in 1663), Crete (the siege of Candia [Heraklion]
between 1667 and 1669], Poland (the siege of Kamanice [Kamanetz-Podolsk] in 1672
and Russia (the siege of Çehrin [Chyhyryn] in 1678)" page number 9.
Brian Davies, Empire and Military revolution in eastern Europe: Russia's Turkish Wars in the eighteenth century page number 9.
Sources
Furthermore, already from late 1677 Moscow’s primary objective in the war had become the protection of Kiev and the Left Bank, and by this test the first Muscovite—Ottoman War could be said to have ended on terms advantageous to Moscow, terms won through the action of the Muscovite and Left Bank Ukrainian armies following the destruction o f Chyhyryn. Victory was achieved in two ways.
@Nicoljaus Invalid, you have no sources and evidence. Karakeçi24 ( talk) 00:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
@Nicoljaus "The indecisive Russo-Turkish War from 1676 to 1681 centered on control of the fortress of Chigirin..."-- Stone, David R. (2006) "Indecisive" is not compatible with Treaty of Bakhchisarai Karakeçi24 ( talk) 12:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
"Russia was drawn into war with the Ottoman empire (1676–81) that ended in stalemate in the armistice of Bakhchisarai in 1681." --Kollmann, Nancy Shields (2017). To according to the treaty of Bakhchisarai Chyhyryn And fortress and rest of the Ukraine were left to the Ottomans is not only armistice. Karakeçi24 ( talk) 12:27, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
@KansasBear you wrote this in Propaganda Turks would not defeated threetimes 1677-1678. Turks would defeated only in 1677 Campaign
First, you leave out the victory of Turks at Tias'min River after third attack Russian lost that why Romodanovsky ordered to leave the citadel and withdraw troops to the left bank. Second, Russian lost beyond the Dnieper and reatret from this battle to Kiev and Turks seized Kaniv (141 near from Kiev)
And you wrote in Propaganda
"The Russian army retreated beyond the Dnieper, beating off the pursuing Turkish army, which would finally leave them in peace. Later the Turks seized Kanev established the power of Yuri Khmelnitsky on the Right-bank Ukraine, but did not dare to go to Kiev, where the Russian troops were stationed."
Why withdraw Russian army the battle and retreat to Kiev if they defated the Turks. After this Turks captured Kaniv.
Karakeçi24 ( talk) 04:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Well, acting with WP:GOODFAITH, I'll try to explain the situation. This was not a war in which the Ottoman Empire took Ukraine away from the Russians. In fact, as a result of the Truce of Andrusovo of 1667, Ukraine was divided into the Right Bank (Polish) and the Left Bank (Moscow) parts. But on the right bank was Kiev (now the capital of Ukraine), which Moscow tried to preserve as an important bridgehead (in a political and religious sense), although by agreement the Russians were supposed to cleanse it after two years. Thus, Moscow did not have any rights to the Right-Bank Ukraine, and if it had defeated the Turks, it would have had to violate the terms of the Truce of Andrusovo and fight with Poland. Therefore, for Moscow, the outcome of the war was acceptable - it secured the Left-Bank Ukraine and, moreover, de facto captured Kiev - Poland was too exhausted in the war with the Ottomans to object and soon recognized its transfer to Moscow. The Ottomans could also be happy - they retained their seizures in the Right-Bank Ukraine. In general, both sides received something at the expense of a third party - Poland (but in the subsequent years Poland returned much of the Right-Bank Ukraine). In reality, only the Ukrainian Cossacks lost, who hoped to preserve the unity of the country on both sides of the Dnieper.-- Nicoljaus ( talk) 09:02, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
I believe there is enough information concerning the result of this war to place "Disputed" for the result in the infobox. Perhaps something like what was done at Battle of Jamrud, whereby we indicate, in a section within the article, what sources state Russian victory, Ottoman victory, and Indecisive(stalemate). Каракорум, Nicoljaus -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 19:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Something like:
"The result of the war, which was ended by the
Treaty of Bakhchisarai, is disputed. Some historians say it was an Ottoman victory,(Murphey 1999, PerrieDavies 2006 ) yet other historians contend it was a Russian victory(Davies 2007). While some historians state it was a stalemate(Kollmann 2017, Stone 2006, PerrieDavies 2006)"
Additional sources can be added for each outcome. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 19:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
I named the Ottoman Sultan Mehmed IV, in the article. Just wanted to be clear, his name is not stated in the source accompanying the text (atleast I tried and couldn't find it), but on the basis of Mehmed ruling in a wide span of year between this war; I think its safe to say that he was "that sultan". Feel free to remove if this isn't concrete evidence. But I think its a safe assumption. Thank you Danial Bass ( talk) 11:20, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:23, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Too much propaganda. (unsigned by anon)05:57, 9 June 2005 81.213.13.241 (Talk)
The result of this war is Ottoman victory. Ottoman Empire captured Chyryhyn 8 years long. Petro The Great took again in second Russo Türkish War 1686 1700. We would be happy when you revert it to Ottoman victory from indecisive. Thank you i have also link with Ottoman victory Historiker123454 ( talk) 09:22, 2 January 2017 (UTC)
Ottoman Took Chyryhyn 8 years along unter 1684. İt is over time of War (1676 1681) Hakan255 ( talk) 08:18, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Ottoman Took Chyryhyn 8 years along until 1684. İt is over time of War (1676 1681) Hakan255 ( talk) 08:21, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Ottoman took Chyryhyn From 1678 until 1686 (I Corrected it) Hakan255 ( talk) 08:34, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
@-Irpen it's more that you are Russian. Hakan255 ( talk) 23:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
Davies, Brian L., Warfare, state and society on the Black Sea steppe, 1500-1700, Routledge, 2007.
Page 172.
@Kansas Bear
Hakan255 (
talk) 16:49, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Please edit according to the Turkish version of:
http://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/1676-1681_Osmanl%C4%B1-Rus_Sava%C5%9F%C4%B1 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Warlordcry ( talk • contribs) 15:29, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: nomination withdrawn. Jenks24 ( talk) 15:16, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Usre:Karak1lc1k has added "Decisive Ottoman victory" using
this questionable source. This "source" does not state that the Russo-Turkish war 1676-81 was a Decisive Ottoman victory.
"The war of 1676–81. In 1677 a Turkish–Crimean Tatar army invaded and ravaged Right-Bank Ukraine and took the capital, Chyhyryn. The Turks' attempt to retain Chyhyryn was repelled by a Russian-Ukrainian force led by Prince G. Romodanovsky and Hetman Ivan Samoilovych (see Chyhyryn campaigns, 1677–8), and the Turks were forced to retreat. In 1681 the Ottoman Porte, the Crimean Khanate, and Muscovy signed the Treaty of Bakhchesarai, according to which Muscovy had sovereignty over the Hetman state and the Zaporizhia, both sides agreed not to colonize the Southern Ukrainian lands between the Boh River and the Dnister River for 20 years, and Turkey retained control of the southern Kyiv region, the Bratslav region, and Podilia."
Therefore, Karak11c1k's edit is
original research. --
Kansas Bear (
talk) 15:10, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
It was descive Ottoman victory. Ottoman army captured Chyryn and owned it 8 years long. The Russia Tsardom captured it again in second 1686 1700 Russo Türkish war Historiker123454 ( talk) 21:39, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Lol you Russians want only take sources from Russians Editors. Hakan255 ( talk) 13:56, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
You take only sources from Russians authors also when it lies Hakan255 ( talk) 13:58, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
An IP has added "Ottoman victory" using Online Britannica as a source, yet according to A Military History of Russia: From Ivan the Terrible to the War in Chechnya, by David R. Stone, page 41, "The indecisive Russo-Turkish War from 1676 to 1681 centered on control of the fortress of Chigririn, just west of the Dnepr River." -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 16:06, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
Hallo. I would like correct the result because there is contradiction ! Ottoman Empire won this 1676 1681 war. Russia Tsardom took Cossacks Hetman after that Sultan Mehmed Avci sent Ibrahim pasha with Ottoman Army to Chyhyryn to capture, but its failed, then the Sultan sent Merzifonlu Kara Mustafa pasha and he took finally Chyhyryn with Ottoman army. Ottoman Empire owned Chyhyryn 31 years long. As result are written Ottoman Victory on Italian, Polish, French sites or books. We were happy when you correct it. Thank you Historiker123454 ( talk) 17:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Notes
^ Davies, Brian L., Warfare, state and society on the Black Sea steppe, 1500-1700, (Routledge, 2007), 160. ^ a b Davies, Brian L., Warfare, state and society on the Black Sea steppe, 1500-1700, 161. ^ Paxton, John and John Traynor, Leaders of Russia and the Soviet Union, (Taylor & Francis Books Inc., 2004), 195.
References
Davies, Brian L., Warfare, state and society on the Black Sea steppe, 1500-1700, Routledge, 2007. Paxton, John and John Traynor, Leaders of Russia and the Soviet Union, Taylor & Francis Books Inc., 2004.
http://dictionnaire.sensagent.leparisien.fr/Russo-Turkish%20War%20(1676%E2%80%931681)/en-en/
Historiker123454 Historiker123454 ( talk) 17:26, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
I wrote to you that Ottoman Empire captured Chigirin in 1678 until 1712 final victory for the 1676 1681 Russo Türkish War Historiker123454 ( talk) 04:11, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
When Ottoman captured Chyhyryn 31 years along after occupy then it is "Ottoman Victory" because the War ends in 1681 Hakan255 ( talk) 14:32, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Taken from above:
I sent you the website again where is written it is Otomman victory
http://dictionnaire.sensagent.leparisien.fr/Russo-Turkish%20War%20(1676%E2%80%931681)/en-en/
Also in Polish, Italian, Türkish Wikipedia it is written Ottoman victory — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historiker123454 ( talk • contribs) 03:05, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Historiker123454 Historiker123454 ( talk) 03:30, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Kansas Bear
There are written in other Wikipedia Languages like on Italian, Polish, Türkish, Romanian as Ottoman victory Here are the links
On Italian Wikipedia https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guerra_russo-turca_(1676-1681)
On Polish Wikipedia https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wojna_rosyjsko-turecka_(1674%E2%80%931681)
On Turkish Wikipedia https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/1676-1681_Osmanl%C4%B1-Rus_Sava%C5%9F%C4%B1
On Romanian Wikipedia https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C4%83zboiul_Ruso-Turc_(1676%E2%80%931681)
also on French English la pariese site is it written Ottoman victory — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historiker123454 ( talk • contribs) 03:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Historiker123454 Historiker123454 ( talk) 03:31, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
I sent you the website again where is written it is Otomman victory
http://dictionnaire.sensagent.leparisien.fr/Russo-Turkish%20War%20(1676%E2%80%931681)/en-en/
Also in Polish, Italian, Türkish Wikipedia it is written Ottoman victory
Historiker123454 Historiker123454 ( talk) 04:02, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Hi Kansas Bear
There are written in other Wikipedia Languages like on Italian, Polish, Türkish, Romanian as Ottoman victory Here are the links
On Italian Wikipedia https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guerra_russo-turca_(1676-1681)
On Polish Wikipedia https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wojna_rosyjsko-turecka_(1674%E2%80%931681)
On Turkish Wikipedia https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/1676-1681_Osmanl%C4%B1-Rus_Sava%C5%9F%C4%B1
On Romanian Wikipedia https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C4%83zboiul_Ruso-Turc_(1676%E2%80%931681)
also on French English la pariese site is it written Ottoman victory
Historiker123454 Historiker123454 ( talk) 04:03, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
Ottomans captured the Chyhyryn after the war. So why indecisive? It was an Ottoman victory — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mnl0g 044 ( talk • contribs) 22:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
The result of 1676-1681 Russo-Turkish War is Ottoman Victory and KansasBear delete the several sources and move to indecisive with 1 source and he means "Wikipedia is written using reliable secondary sources"
He wrote In Campaign of 1678 in the beginning only the attack of Russians, but he leave out the the counterattack and the victory of the Turks.
Or after capturing Chyhyryn, Turks attacks the Russians army beyond the Dnieper and after offensive Russian army reatret to Kiev and Turks seized then Kaniv and he wrote in Propaganda:
"The Russian army retreated beyond the Dnieper, beating off the pursuing Turkish army, which would finally leave them in peace. Later the Turks seized Kanev established the power of Yuri Khmelnitsky on the Right-bank Ukraine, but did not dare to go to Kiev, where the Russian troops were stationed."
Summary of this war: The 1676-1681 Ottoman-Russian War, or Muscovite Campaign, was the first great war between the Ottoman Empire and the Russian Tsardom. During this war, Merzifonlu Kara Mustafa Pasha became the grand vizier. As a result of the 5-year war, the Russian Tsardom, which could not be strengthened was defeated, and with the Treaty of Bakhchisarai on January 31, 1681, Chyhyryn Fortress and the rest of the Ukraine were left to the Ottomans.
according to the treaty Chyhyryn Fortress and rest of the Ukraine were left to the Ottomans. Aftermath capturing Chyhyryn fortress, in the continuation battle in the near from Chyhyryn Russian Army had leave the battle and retreat from this battle to Kiev. Ottoman army march 140 km into Russian territory and captured Kaniv and hold for decades years after (Russo Turkish War 1676-1681) war.
Notes
Davies, Brian L., Warfare, state and society on the Black Sea steppe, 1500-1700 " page number 172 is written Victory for Ottoman and Moscow loss Chyhyryn.
In Rhoads Murphey "Ottoman Warfare 1500-1700" book is written; "In the decades preceding the Ottomans’ attempted siege of Vienna in 1683 Ottoman
armies had successfully prosecuted single-front wars in Hungary (the sieges of Varad
[Oradea] in 1660 and Uyvar [N. Zamky] in 1663), Crete (the siege of Candia [Heraklion]
between 1667 and 1669], Poland (the siege of Kamanice [Kamanetz-Podolsk] in 1672
and Russia (the siege of Çehrin [Chyhyryn] in 1678)" page number 9.
Brian Davies, Empire and Military revolution in eastern Europe: Russia's Turkish Wars in the eighteenth century page number 9.
Sources
Furthermore, already from late 1677 Moscow’s primary objective in the war had become the protection of Kiev and the Left Bank, and by this test the first Muscovite—Ottoman War could be said to have ended on terms advantageous to Moscow, terms won through the action of the Muscovite and Left Bank Ukrainian armies following the destruction o f Chyhyryn. Victory was achieved in two ways.
@Nicoljaus Invalid, you have no sources and evidence. Karakeçi24 ( talk) 00:28, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
@Nicoljaus "The indecisive Russo-Turkish War from 1676 to 1681 centered on control of the fortress of Chigirin..."-- Stone, David R. (2006) "Indecisive" is not compatible with Treaty of Bakhchisarai Karakeçi24 ( talk) 12:19, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
"Russia was drawn into war with the Ottoman empire (1676–81) that ended in stalemate in the armistice of Bakhchisarai in 1681." --Kollmann, Nancy Shields (2017). To according to the treaty of Bakhchisarai Chyhyryn And fortress and rest of the Ukraine were left to the Ottomans is not only armistice. Karakeçi24 ( talk) 12:27, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
@KansasBear you wrote this in Propaganda Turks would not defeated threetimes 1677-1678. Turks would defeated only in 1677 Campaign
First, you leave out the victory of Turks at Tias'min River after third attack Russian lost that why Romodanovsky ordered to leave the citadel and withdraw troops to the left bank. Second, Russian lost beyond the Dnieper and reatret from this battle to Kiev and Turks seized Kaniv (141 near from Kiev)
And you wrote in Propaganda
"The Russian army retreated beyond the Dnieper, beating off the pursuing Turkish army, which would finally leave them in peace. Later the Turks seized Kanev established the power of Yuri Khmelnitsky on the Right-bank Ukraine, but did not dare to go to Kiev, where the Russian troops were stationed."
Why withdraw Russian army the battle and retreat to Kiev if they defated the Turks. After this Turks captured Kaniv.
Karakeçi24 ( talk) 04:10, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
Well, acting with WP:GOODFAITH, I'll try to explain the situation. This was not a war in which the Ottoman Empire took Ukraine away from the Russians. In fact, as a result of the Truce of Andrusovo of 1667, Ukraine was divided into the Right Bank (Polish) and the Left Bank (Moscow) parts. But on the right bank was Kiev (now the capital of Ukraine), which Moscow tried to preserve as an important bridgehead (in a political and religious sense), although by agreement the Russians were supposed to cleanse it after two years. Thus, Moscow did not have any rights to the Right-Bank Ukraine, and if it had defeated the Turks, it would have had to violate the terms of the Truce of Andrusovo and fight with Poland. Therefore, for Moscow, the outcome of the war was acceptable - it secured the Left-Bank Ukraine and, moreover, de facto captured Kiev - Poland was too exhausted in the war with the Ottomans to object and soon recognized its transfer to Moscow. The Ottomans could also be happy - they retained their seizures in the Right-Bank Ukraine. In general, both sides received something at the expense of a third party - Poland (but in the subsequent years Poland returned much of the Right-Bank Ukraine). In reality, only the Ukrainian Cossacks lost, who hoped to preserve the unity of the country on both sides of the Dnieper.-- Nicoljaus ( talk) 09:02, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
I believe there is enough information concerning the result of this war to place "Disputed" for the result in the infobox. Perhaps something like what was done at Battle of Jamrud, whereby we indicate, in a section within the article, what sources state Russian victory, Ottoman victory, and Indecisive(stalemate). Каракорум, Nicoljaus -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 19:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Something like:
"The result of the war, which was ended by the
Treaty of Bakhchisarai, is disputed. Some historians say it was an Ottoman victory,(Murphey 1999, PerrieDavies 2006 ) yet other historians contend it was a Russian victory(Davies 2007). While some historians state it was a stalemate(Kollmann 2017, Stone 2006, PerrieDavies 2006)"
Additional sources can be added for each outcome. -- Kansas Bear ( talk) 19:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
I named the Ottoman Sultan Mehmed IV, in the article. Just wanted to be clear, his name is not stated in the source accompanying the text (atleast I tried and couldn't find it), but on the basis of Mehmed ruling in a wide span of year between this war; I think its safe to say that he was "that sultan". Feel free to remove if this isn't concrete evidence. But I think its a safe assumption. Thank you Danial Bass ( talk) 11:20, 24 July 2022 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 17:23, 22 November 2022 (UTC)