 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
 | The contents of the Soviet destroyer Yakov Sverdlov page were merged into Russian destroyer Novik (1911) on 3 July 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Soviet destroyer Yakov Sverdlov should be merged here. They're the same ship. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 12:51, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- I'm inclined to agree, this is the standard we use for example with the Gangut-class battleships: one article under their pre-revolutionary names, that covers both their Imperial and Soviet service, and a redirect from their Soviet names. See, eg, Russian battleship Gangut (1911) and the redirect Soviet battleship Oktyabrskaya Revolutsiya. 129.67.117.147 ( talk) 12:54, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- "She was originally designed by AG Vulcan Stettin." -- It is completely wrong. AG Vulcan designed only engines, not the ship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.28.160.73 ( talk) 22:20, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
"She was originally designed by AG Vulcan Stettin." -- It is wrong. AG Vulcan was participant in the project, dealing mainly with power/propulsion, but primary designer was Putilovsky plant.
http://www.navypedia.org/ships/russia/ru_dd_novik.htm : " Novik was built under the design of Putilov plant and was equipped with triple-shaft Curtis-AEG-Vulkan machinery and 6 Vulkan boilers." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.28.176.175 ( talk) 07:18, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The contents of the Soviet destroyer Yakov Sverdlov page were merged into Russian destroyer Novik (1911) on 3 July 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Soviet destroyer Yakov Sverdlov should be merged here. They're the same ship. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 12:51, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- I'm inclined to agree, this is the standard we use for example with the Gangut-class battleships: one article under their pre-revolutionary names, that covers both their Imperial and Soviet service, and a redirect from their Soviet names. See, eg, Russian battleship Gangut (1911) and the redirect Soviet battleship Oktyabrskaya Revolutsiya. 129.67.117.147 ( talk) 12:54, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
- "She was originally designed by AG Vulcan Stettin." -- It is completely wrong. AG Vulcan designed only engines, not the ship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.28.160.73 ( talk) 22:20, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
"She was originally designed by AG Vulcan Stettin." -- It is wrong. AG Vulcan was participant in the project, dealing mainly with power/propulsion, but primary designer was Putilovsky plant.
http://www.navypedia.org/ships/russia/ru_dd_novik.htm : " Novik was built under the design of Putilov plant and was equipped with triple-shaft Curtis-AEG-Vulkan machinery and 6 Vulkan boilers." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.28.176.175 ( talk) 07:18, 7 April 2020 (UTC)