This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
User:Russellsage has declared their affiliation with the Foundation on their user page. This editor has made some good and significant contributions to the article. I have advised them on the rules about editing with a conflict of interest, and expressed the opinion to them that I thought they did a good job of maintaining a neutral point of view in contributing to the article. I've done some copyediting and I will continue to look for anything that might be problematic, but so far I have not come across anything. I urge other editors to assume good faith regarding this editor's future contributions to the article. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 19:27, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
I have added two visiting journalists (there already two visiting scholars) but my edit was reverted with this edit summary: we're not a newspaper, or a vehicloe for promotion - this information is not encyclopedic. What do others think? Ottawahitech ( talk) 03:12, 30 December 2015 (UTC)please ping me
I have removed all the detail (too much in my opinion)- is this satisfactory and not "promotional"? Ottawahitech ( talk) 17:08, 30 December 2015 (UTC)please ping me
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
User:Russellsage has declared their affiliation with the Foundation on their user page. This editor has made some good and significant contributions to the article. I have advised them on the rules about editing with a conflict of interest, and expressed the opinion to them that I thought they did a good job of maintaining a neutral point of view in contributing to the article. I've done some copyediting and I will continue to look for anything that might be problematic, but so far I have not come across anything. I urge other editors to assume good faith regarding this editor's future contributions to the article. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 19:27, 30 June 2011 (UTC)
I have added two visiting journalists (there already two visiting scholars) but my edit was reverted with this edit summary: we're not a newspaper, or a vehicloe for promotion - this information is not encyclopedic. What do others think? Ottawahitech ( talk) 03:12, 30 December 2015 (UTC)please ping me
I have removed all the detail (too much in my opinion)- is this satisfactory and not "promotional"? Ottawahitech ( talk) 17:08, 30 December 2015 (UTC)please ping me